Undergrad The Length of World Line: Prerequisite for Proper Time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The prerequisite for the statement "the length of world line equals proper time" is that the object must possess mass, as the worldline must be timelike everywhere for proper time to be defined. The scaling factor, whether C=i or C=1, is arbitrary and does not affect the fundamental relationship. The metric used, either -+++ or +---, is a matter of sign convention and unit choice, similar to using different measurement systems. Proper time is more accurately described as the integral of the square root of the absolute value of the spacetime interval, represented mathematically as dτ=√|ds²|.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski geometry
  • Familiarity with spacetime intervals and metrics
  • Knowledge of proper time and worldlines in physics
  • Basic grasp of mass-energy equivalence
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of timelike and spacelike intervals in relativity
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of Minkowski geometry
  • Learn about the twin paradox and its relation to proper time
  • Investigate the role of mass in defining worldlines in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of spacetime and proper time concepts.

GR191511
Messages
76
Reaction score
6
What is the prerequisite of "the length of world line equals proper time"?C=i?orC=1?If metric is-+++:
##ds^2=-c^2d\tau^2\Rightarrow whenC=i,s=\tau##
If metric is +---:
##ds^2=c^2d\tau^2\Rightarrow whenC=1,s=\tau##
So,which one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The prerequisite is that the object have mass. The scaling factor is unimportant, it is just an arbitrary choice of units and sign convention.
 
  • Like
Likes GR191511, vanhees71 and malawi_glenn
GR191511 said:
What is the prerequisite of "the length of world line equals proper time"?
The worldline must be timelike everywhere, or else proper time is not defined for it (equivalent to Dale's comment about mass).

The value of ##c## is just a choice of ratio between units of timelike and spacelike displacements, so is unimportant. It's similar to putting a meter rule and a yardstick end to end - the total length is the sum of the components' lengths regardless of the units I used to specify them. Experienced people convert units without prompting - inserting ##c## as needed is just a novel example of something you would take in stride in other contexts.

Otherwise, if I were being precise I'd say that ##d\tau=\sqrt{|ds^2|}##. I think that saying that proper time is the length of a worldline is an imprecise analogy. I use it either with people who don't understand Minkowski geometry at all (B-level twin paradox threads) or with people who understand it well enough to know I'm being sloppy and will insert modulus signs as needed. Either way I'd probably scare-quote it.
 
  • Like
Likes GR191511, vanhees71 and malawi_glenn
Dale said:
The prerequisite is that the object have mass. The scaling factor is unimportant, it is just an arbitrary choice of units and sign convention.
Thanks
 
Ibix said:
The worldline must be timelike everywhere, or else proper time is not defined for it (equivalent to Dale's comment about mass).

The value of ##c## is just a choice of ratio between units of timelike and spacelike displacements, so is unimportant. It's similar to putting a meter rule and a yardstick end to end - the total length is the sum of the components' lengths regardless of the units I used to specify them. Experienced people convert units without prompting - inserting ##c## as needed is just a novel example of something you would take in stride in other contexts.

Otherwise, if I were being precise I'd say that ##d\tau=\sqrt{|ds^2|}##. I think that saying that proper time is the length of a worldline is an imprecise analogy. I use it either with people who don't understand Minkowski geometry at all (B-level twin paradox threads) or with people who understand it well enough to know I'm being sloppy and will insert modulus signs as needed. Either way I'd probably scare-quote it.
Thank you! I got it
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
697
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
5K