Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the visibility of the smoke produced by dry ice, questioning whether it is actually carbon dioxide (CO2) or a result of other factors, such as moisture in the air. Participants explore the phenomenon from various angles, including physical properties, atmospheric conditions, and experimental observations.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- One participant questions whether the visible smoke from dry ice is actually CO2, suggesting that it does not make sense to see CO2 evaporating, as it is normally invisible.
- Another participant explains that the smoke is a result of sublimation, where solid CO2 converts directly to gas, creating a dense area of CO2 gas that appears to dissipate quickly.
- A different viewpoint challenges the visibility of gaseous CO2 at atmospheric pressure, proposing that the smoke is likely condensed water droplets from the surrounding air due to the low temperature of the dry ice.
- One participant mentions observing a similar phenomenon in a dry nitrogen/CO2 atmosphere, raising the possibility of residual water in the system affecting visibility.
- Another participant suggests that the temperature drop caused by dry ice may lead to the air reaching 100% relative humidity, contributing to the visible effect.
- Several participants agree that the visible smoke is primarily condensed atmospheric water, emphasizing that CO2 itself is invisible.
- One participant draws a parallel between the condensation seen with dry ice and the condensation on a cold glass, further illustrating the point about water vapor.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree that the visible smoke is related to condensed water vapor rather than CO2 itself. However, there are differing opinions on the exact mechanisms and conditions that lead to this visibility, indicating that multiple competing views remain.
Contextual Notes
Some assumptions about the conditions under which the observations are made, such as atmospheric pressure and humidity levels, are not fully explored. The discussion also does not resolve the specific nature of the gas behavior in different environments.