The new number nullity. A great discovery?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sharp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discovery
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "nullity" as a number or symbol representing nothing, and whether this is a significant new discovery in mathematics. Participants explore the implications of equating 0^0 with 0/0 and question the validity of this reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses skepticism about the novelty of the concept of nullity, suggesting it has been known in higher mathematics for a long time.
  • There is a challenge regarding the reasoning behind equating 0^0 with 0/0, with one participant labeling it as circular reasoning that does not resolve any issues.
  • Another participant points out that a previous thread exists on the topic, indicating ongoing interest or debate.
  • A later reply dismisses the discussion as "complete and utter idiocy," reflecting strong disagreement or frustration with the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus, with clear disagreement on the significance and validity of the concepts being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions and implications of nullity and the operations involving 0^0 and 0/0 remain unresolved, contributing to the debate.

sharp
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The "new" number nullity. A great discovery?

Hey guys, I just ran across this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/conte..._feature.shtml

It's being hailed as a great discovery in some circles but I fail to see the newness of the concept of a number or symbol representing nothing (we've had that ever since I've been into higher math).

On the other hand I also fail to se the use of equating 0^0 with 0/0. Seems like circular reasoning to me and not solving anything. What do you guys think?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
shrap's link isn't working.
 
Wow..sorri i just read it now..what complete and utter idiocy..
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Is There Evidence to Suggest Our Universe is Anisotropic?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Graduate Choices of Axiomatic and Number Systems / Sets and Alternatives
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate Is Mathematics a Belief System?
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Undergrad Atmospheric Density vs Altitude in an O'Neil Cylinder
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
What's the Real Difference Between 'Science' and 'Crackpottery'?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
April Fool's Physics Papers 2026
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
518
Graduate Collatz Conjecture - Bouncing Ideas
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
How do some get into research at Uni?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Studying Skipping Chapters in Stewart’s Calculus? (Pearson's Edexcel IAL Background)
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
WaveGrid - Non-equilibrium Emergence Sandbox
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K