The new number nullity. A great discovery?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sharp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discovery
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the concept of "number nullity," which some are calling a significant discovery, while others argue it lacks novelty since the idea of a symbol representing nothing has existed in mathematics for a long time. Participants express skepticism about equating 0^0 with 0/0, viewing it as circular reasoning that fails to provide clarity. The conversation highlights differing opinions on the relevance and implications of this mathematical concept. Overall, the debate questions the validity and originality of the claims surrounding number nullity. The topic remains contentious among mathematicians and enthusiasts alike.
sharp
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The "new" number nullity. A great discovery?

Hey guys, I just ran across this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/conte..._feature.shtml

It's being hailed as a great discovery in some circles but I fail to see the newness of the concept of a number or symbol representing nothing (we've had that ever since I've been into higher math).

On the other hand I also fail to se the use of equating 0^0 with 0/0. Seems like circular reasoning to me and not solving anything. What do you guys think?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
shrap's link isn't working.
 
Wow..sorri i just read it now..what complete and utter idiocy..
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top