The Oberth effect and multiple orbits

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter razidan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple Orbits
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Oberth effect in the context of SpaceIL's lunar lander mission, which utilizes multiple orbits around Earth to optimize fuel efficiency. Participants agree that multiple smaller impulses at perigee are more efficient than a single large impulse due to the increasing velocity at each burn, which enhances the effectiveness of the Oberth effect. It is established that the SpaceIL lander employs a Moon landing engine for Earth-Moon transfer, requiring approximately one hour for a single burn, making multiple burns necessary. The Oberth effect can save around 50% of the fuel required for a lunar orbit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Oberth effect in astrodynamics
  • Basic knowledge of orbital mechanics and impulse maneuvers
  • Familiarity with the concept of perigee in orbital transfers
  • Awareness of thrust limitations in spacecraft propulsion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical principles behind the Oberth effect
  • Explore the mechanics of orbital transfers using multiple burns
  • Study the performance characteristics of the SpaceIL lunar lander engine
  • Investigate the implications of thrust-to-weight ratios in spacecraft design
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, astrodynamics students, and anyone interested in optimizing spacecraft fuel efficiency during lunar missions.

razidan
Messages
75
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I've been following the launch of the first commercial lunar lander, SpaceIL.
Because of its small size, there is not enough fuel for a more direct approach to the moon, so the path they are taking is multiple orbits around the Earth with impulses at the perigee, at each orbit.
As I understand it, they are using the oberth effect to gain better fuel efficiency.

Here is my question - I've been wondering if one impulse that provides a lot of ## \Delta v## will be as efficient as many smaller impulses that build up to the same ## \Delta v##, say, in terms of mass of fuel used.

My guess is that many smaller impulses are better, because each time the engine fires, the speed is a bit faster (from the previous burn) so the oberth effect tells us the burn will be more efficient. But, I want to prove it to myself, also, I'm not sure I'm correct. I have no experience with astrodynamics or orbital mechanics

Thanks!

more info:
https://www.space.com/spaceil-beresheet.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Multiple small burns are more efficient, but it happens mostly because of limited thrust. With single burn, you need to fire engine for longer for same orbital transfer, and therefore some of thrusting occurs far from perigee.
As i understand, SpaceIL lander re-use Moon landing engine for Earth-Moon tranfer, having initial acceleration below 0.1g, which require ~1 hour single burn for Earth-Moon transfer - impossible to make in one burn before leaving perigee part of orbit.
 
razidan said:
Here is my question - I've been wondering if one impulse that provides a lot of ΔvΔv \Delta v will be as efficient as many smaller impulses that build up to the same ΔvΔv \Delta v, say, in terms of mass of fuel used.
With this style of orbit change, you can only use the impulse at the lowest point in the orbit and each orbit will take a very long time (almost one month at maximum). How long do you have in which to change from LEO to an elliptical orbit to reach the Moon?
The Oberth effect saves around half of the fuel that you would need to reach a full Moon orbit, I believe.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
541
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K