How Is Spin-Orbit Coupling Derived from the Dirac Equation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the Dirac equation from the relativistic expression of kinetic energy, specifically addressing the inclusion of electric and magnetic potentials in the form of ##\mathbf P -εA## and ##\mathbf H -ε\phi##. Participants clarify that this approach is standard in quantum mechanics. The conversation also highlights the importance of understanding the parameters ##\alpha## and ##\beta##, as well as the identity involving the Pauli matrices for deriving the spin-orbit coupling. Recommended resources include Sakurai and Napolitano's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" and Bransden and Joachain's "Physics of Atoms and Molecules" for better derivations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac equation and its significance in quantum mechanics.
  • Familiarity with relativistic kinetic energy expressions.
  • Knowledge of electric and magnetic potentials in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic understanding of Pauli matrices and their applications in spin systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Dirac equation from relativistic kinetic energy in detail.
  • Learn about the role of electric and magnetic potentials in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the identity involving Pauli matrices for applications in spin-orbit coupling.
  • Read Sakurai and Napolitano's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" for comprehensive insights on quantum mechanics principles.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in advanced topics such as the Dirac equation and spin-orbit coupling in quantum systems.

amjad-sh
Messages
240
Reaction score
13
I have read in the internet that "One naturally derive the dirac equation when starting from the relativistic expression of kinetic energy:

##\mathbf H^2=c^2\mathbf P^2 +m^2c^4## where ##\mathbf P## is the canonical momentum.
Inclusion of electric and magnetic potentials ##\phi## and ##A## by substituting ##\mathbf P -εA##in ##\mathbf P## and ##\mathbf H -ε\phi## in ##\mathbf H## we get ##(\mathbf H -ε\phi)^2=(c\mathbf P -εA)^2+m^2c^4##

1-My first question is: Why potential and electric potentials are included in that way, I mean ##\mathbf P -εA##in ##\mathbf P## and ##\mathbf H -ε\phi## in ##\mathbf H##?

Then the text I am reading continued to the part where he stated the dirac equation which is:

##(\mathbf H-c\sum_{\mu}p_{\mu}-\beta mc^2)\psi=0##

Now with the fact that## [\mathbf H -ε\phi -cα.(\mathbf p -ε/c\mathbf A) -\beta mc^2][\mathbf H -ε\phi +cα.(\mathbf p -ε/c\mathbf A) +\beta mc^2]\psi=0##

Using the approximation that the kinetic and the potential energies are small compared to mc^2, two components of the spin function can be neglected and the equation above take the form :

##[1/2m(\mathbf p -ε/c\mathbf A)^2 +ε\phi -(ε\hbar/2mc)\sigma \cdot \mathbf B -(ε\hbar/4m^2c^2)\mathbf E \cdot \mathbf p -(ε\hbar/4m^2c^2)σ \cdot (\mathbf E \times \mathbf p)]\psi=W\psi##
Where W +mc^2 is the total energy.

2-My second question is how we can reach the second formula, If somebody can give me some hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What internet was that? Mine says

No results found for "naturally derive the dirac equation when starting from the relativistic expression of kinetic".​
 
I downloaded this chapter.It is in the first page.
 

Attachments

It says "One naturally arrives at the Dirac equation when starting from the relativistic expression for the kinetic energy" . Hard to find an author, though.

Anyway, taking ##e\phi## and ##e\vec A## into account as shown is standard (naturally :smile:), see e.g here or here
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amjad-sh
BvU said:
It says "One naturally arrives at the Dirac equation when starting from the relativistic expression for the kinetic energy" . Hard to find an author, though.

Anyway, taking ##e\phi## and ##e\vec A## into account as shown is standard (naturally :smile:), see e.g here or here

Thanks,this was helpful.
I got the answer of my first question, can you give me some hints to reach the last equation?
 
amjad-sh said:
I got the answer of my first question, can you give me some hints to reach the last equation?
Do you know what ##\alpha## and ##\beta## are? You are going to need that, along with the identity
$$
(\mathbf{\sigma} \cdot \mathbf{A})(\mathbf{\sigma} \cdot \mathbf{B}) = \mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{B} + i \mathbf{\sigma} \cdot (\mathbf{A} \times \mathbf{B})
$$

By the way, you can find much better derivations of the spin-orbit coupling than the document you posted. Check out instead one of
Sakurai and Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics
Bransden and Joachain, Physics of Atoms and Molecules
Friedrich, Theoretical Atomic Physics
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amjad-sh and BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
591
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
727