Unraveling the Mystery: The Big Bang and the Origin of the Universe

Click For Summary
Scientists assert that there was nothing before the Big Bang, which raises questions about the origins of the universe. The concept of the universe emerging from nothing challenges conventional understanding and lacks definitive answers. Some argue that science cannot address what existed prior to the universe's creation, while others believe that science encompasses all knowledge, implying that nothing existed before. The discussion is deemed unproductive, with a preference for focusing on physics rather than religious interpretations. Ultimately, the topic remains a complex and unresolved area of inquiry in cosmology.
astrobmw
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Scientists suggest that there was nothing before the Big Bang. Nothing. Seems to me, the fact that the whole universe came from nothing makes no sense. I know that there isn't an answer yet but I would like to hear what others might think about this issue
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Science is about the physical universe, it can't talk about anything beyond it, so it can't talk about before universe's creation. In this sense, scientists say there was nothing before the creation of the universe scientifically!
Now some people believe science is all we have, so they say we can't know what was before the creation of the universe.
Some other say science is all there is and so there was nothing before the creation of the universe actually!
There are other ideas too, which I prefer not to mention because here we should talk about physics and I guess people don't like to hear about religion!
 
The "similar threads" section below will take you to some of the previous discussions along these lines. It's not a productive discussion, as Shyan points out above, and there's not much point in having it again.

Locked.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K