The photon as a mediator particle

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter espen180
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Photon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of photons as mediator particles of the electromagnetic force, particularly in the context of charged black holes and their interaction with other charged bodies. Participants explore the implications of general relativity (GR) and quantum field theory (QFT) regarding the behavior of photons and virtual particles, especially in relation to event horizons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the necessity of knowing both position and momentum 4-vectors of a photon, referencing the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) and the behavior of photons along geodesic curves in spacetime.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of virtual particles, suggesting they do not obey the same properties as normal particles, including the ability to travel faster than light and being unaffected by event horizons.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that while GR forbids information from escaping a black hole's event horizon, virtual photons do not carry information, as per the no-hair theorem.
  • One participant questions how photons can convey information about the charge inside a black hole if they do not carry information at all, raising concerns about the implications of this on the understanding of electromagnetic interactions.
  • Another participant elaborates that to carry information, a wave must be modulated, and discusses how this relates to the information about a black hole's mass being determinable even after its collapse.
  • Further discussion touches on the nature of causality, distinguishing between information that can lead to paradoxes and facts that remain constant over time, such as the mass of a black hole.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of information carried by photons and virtual particles, particularly in relation to black holes. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the relationship between virtual particles and event horizons, as well as the implications of causality in the context of information transfer related to black holes.

espen180
Messages
831
Reaction score
2
I would like to ask some questions about the photon as a mediator particle of the electromagnetic force.

As far as I know, in order to dertermine the complete state of a photon, we need to know the values of two entities, which are the position and momentum 4-vectors [tex]x^{\mu}[/tex] and [tex]p^{\mu}[/tex]. These are related through the HUP:
[tex]\Delta x^{\mu}\Delta p^{\mu}\geq \frac{\hbar}{2}[/tex] (no summation)
Also, photons always follow geodesic curves in space-time.

However, despite the fact that no geodesics exit from beyond the event horizon of a black hole, charged black holes exert a Lorentz force on other charged bodies. It appears like photons, when mediating the Lorentz force, are exempt from the rules of GR. I see two possibilities:

1. I have misunderstood something fundamental about charged black holes.
2. I don't know enough particle physics to make intelligent guesses about mediator particles.

If anyone could explain the issue to me, I would appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i googled and found the following
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=65583
summarizing virtual particles do not obey several properties that normal particles obey, they can travel faster than light, need not be on the mass shell and hence blind to the event horizon.
also this is purely speculation and only a correct theory of QGR can tell us the answer
 
Interesting question.

One thing to point out is that what's really forbidden by GR is for *information* to escape from inside the event horizon; if it did, then there would be a local Minkowski frame in which the information was going faster than c, and that leads to a violation of causality.

But the virtual photons coming from a charged black hole don't carry any information. By the no-hair theorem, you can't use them to gain any information about the distribution of charges inside the event horizon, or about the motion of the charges.
 
As a "relativist", I have a little problem with speeds and transfers exceeding c. Putting that aside, I would like to raise a point mentioned in the thread Prathyush linked to.

If the photons do not carry no "information" at all, how can they "inform" the outside world about the existence of and amount of charge inside the black hole?
 
espen180 said:
As a "relativist", I have a little problem with speeds and transfers exceeding c. Putting that aside, I would like to raise a point mentioned in the thread Prathyush linked to. If the photons do not carry no "information" at all, how can they "inform" the outside world about the existence of and amount of charge inside the black hole?

To carry information, a wave has to be modulated. You can't carry information with just a DC signal (or with an unmodulated sine wave). This is why, for example, you can have phase velocities greater than c.

This is exactly the same issue as the question of how the black hole can inform the outside world of the existence and amount of mass inside the black hole. This is information that was already present, and determinable by outside observers, before the black hole collapsed.
 
Last edited:
A very interesting point, was unaware till now.
bcrowell said:
To carry information, a wave has to be modulated. You can't carry information with just a DC signal (or with an unmodulated sine wave). This is why, for example, you can have phase velocities greater than c.

bcrowell said:
This is information that was already present, and determinable by outside observers, before the black hole collapsed.

What do u mean by this? Even a long time after the black hole collapse we can determine the mass of the black hole
 
This is information that was already present, and determinable by outside observers, before the black hole collapsed.
Prathyush said:
What do u mean by this? Even a long time after the black hole collapse we can determine the mass of the black hole

Causality is violated if, for instance, I get information about which shirt I'm going to wear tomorrow. If I find out that I'm going to wear the red shirt tomorrow, I can create a paradox by intentionally wearing the blue shirt instead. This type of causality violation occurs in relativity whenever you have a particle with a spacelike world-line. This includes particles like tachyons that move faster than c, and it includes particles escaping through the event horizon of a black hole.

Causality is not violated if I find out that 2+2=4, or that the mass of the sun has a certain value. These facts were true before I was born, and will still be true after I'm dead. Knowing the mass of a black hole is the same way. It doesn't create the possibility of any violation of causality. By conservation of mass-energy, the mass stays the same. It was the same before the black hole collapsed, and it will keep on being the same in the future.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
966
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K