The Physics of Tension in a Phone Cord

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsHatesMe01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the tension in a phone cord based on the properties of wave propagation along the cord. The original poster presents a scenario involving a transverse wave pulse, its length, mass, and the time taken for multiple trips along the cord.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different equations relating mass per unit length, wave velocity, and tension. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their calculations and the formulas used.

Discussion Status

Several participants are engaged in checking the original poster's approach and calculations. There is a focus on ensuring the correct application of formulas and units, with some participants suggesting a need to clarify the relationships between the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential discrepancies in the results and question the realism of the problem setup, indicating that the parameters may not represent a practical scenario.

PhysicsHatesMe01
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Question:

A phone cord is 3.75 m long. The cord has a mass of 0.200 kg. A transverse wave pulse is produced by plucking one end of the taut cord. The pulse makes four trips down and back along the cord in 0.915 s. What is the tension in the cord?

Maybe I'm using the wrong formula or my math is off. Help?

M = .200kg
L = 3.75m
P = .915s

U=M/L= .200/3.75 = .0533

C=(3.75)(4)/.915= 16.3934

(16.3934)^2 (.0533) = 143.2

But, 143.2 isn't right.

Thanks for help. I really hate it when I think I know what I'm doing, but I don't get the answer. It's really annoying.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's check a couple things. What equation are you using to relate the mass per unit length, the propagation velocity, and the tension? And in your last line of calculations, be sure to include units to serve as a check that you haven't left anything out.


EDIT -- Pretty funny, I just saw your PF handle. Well, welcome to PF anyway! :smile:
 
I can't find the equation I used for what's shown above, for some reason.

I did find this one online: v = (T/(m/L))^0.5

and when I re-arranged it to find T, I got v^2(m)(L)=T which, when I plugged in the numbers, came out to .0021, which doesn't seem right.

I don't know what I'm doing. I don't get physics at all... even with a tutor :(
 
I found a similar problem online:

A phone cord is 4.20 m long. The cord has a mass of 0.180 kg. A transverse wave pulse is produced by plucking one end of the taut cord. The pulse makes four trips down and back along the cord in 0.745 s. What is the tension in the cord? ___ N

Solution 23660

Mass: m = 0.180 kg
Length: L = 4.20 m
u = m / L = 0.180 / 4.20 = 3/70
c = (4.20 * 4) / 0.745 = 3360/149
T = (3360/149)^2 * (3/70) = approximately 21.8
The tension is 21.8 N.


I don't know what formula they used, but that's the same thing I did at first. I just plugged in my numbers again and I'm still getting the wrong answer.
 
PhysicsHatesMe01 said:
...
I did find this one online: v = (T/(m/L))^0.5

and when I re-arranged it to find T, I got v^2(m)(L)=T ...

You need to take it slow. Work on the paper. That is do not skip steps. Keep it simple - do not try to leave out obvious steps. That way you tend to make errors. The formula conversion to T above is not corrcect.
 
Keeping(m/L) together, I now got:

V^2*(M/L)=T

and I get 16.39^2/.0533=5042 and that seems too high.

I know I should square v because anything to the 1/2 power = a sq. root...
 
I get the same answer. It is difficult to put the answer into perspective. Hanging 500 kg (6 persons!) from a 200 g string (quite a thick/heavy string for its length)? Causing a disturbance to travel at only 16 m/s (seems a bit slow for the given tension)? At what rate will it vibrate? This seems like an artificial problem to me - it probably does not represents something in real life.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K