Undergrad The "problem" of Induction and conservation laws

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Problem of Induction, which posits that there is no logical necessity for nature to remain uniform, raising questions about its implications for conservation laws. While some argue that conservation laws can be proven deductively through Noether’s theorem, this does not guarantee that the underlying symmetries are universal. The Problem of Induction is acknowledged as a significant philosophical issue, but the focus remains on the practical application of scientific methods that rely on the assumption of induction. The thread ultimately emphasizes the importance of discussing scientific practice rather than delving into philosophical debates. The conversation concludes with a reminder that such philosophical discussions are outside the forum's intended scope.
TCO
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Induction and conservation laws
If we by induction in the scientific method mean:

"that the future will resemble the past" and The Problem of Induction states:

"There is no logical necessity forcing nature to remain uniform"

does The Problem of Induction implies violation of (global) conservation laws?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes weirdoguy and PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
TCO said:
"that the future will resemble the past"
"There is no logical necessity forcing nature to remain uniform"
Can you cite credible references that state these definitions of "induction in the scientific method" and "the problem of induction"? Thanks.
 
TCO said:
does The Problem of Induction implies violation of (global) conservation laws?
Not necessarily, as many conservation laws can be proven deductively - this is Noether’s theorem. But this just pushes the problem down one level; there’s no deductive argument that the symmetries underlying a conservation law must be universal.

The PoI is an interesting and important philosophical problem but it is out of scope for PF. We’re here to discuss how science is generally practiced, and “proceed on the assumption that induction generally works” is an essential part of that practice.

This thread is closed under the forum rule about not hosting philosophy discussions.
 
  • Like
Likes Ivan Nikiforov, Bystander, TCO and 1 other person
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K