The relation between the normal and the slope of a cylindrical curve

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical relationship between the normal vector and the slope of a cylindrical curve, specifically represented by the equation $$\frac{1}{\rho} \frac{d\rho }{d\psi }=\tan\left(\frac{\theta+\psi}{2}\right)$$. The user expresses confusion regarding the derivation of this equation and the function F used in the gradient operator, particularly questioning the origin of the variable $$\rho$$ and its relation to the cylindrical coordinates. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on the derivation process and the components involved in defining the normal vector in cylindrical geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cylindrical coordinates and their applications
  • Familiarity with gradient operators in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of the relationship between normal vectors and curves
  • Basic grasp of trigonometric functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of normal vectors in cylindrical coordinates
  • Study the application of the gradient operator in different coordinate systems
  • Explore the mathematical properties of the function $$F$$ in relation to cylindrical curves
  • Learn about the implications of the tangent function in geometric contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and engineers interested in the geometric properties of curves, particularly those working with cylindrical coordinates and vector calculus.

baby_1
Messages
159
Reaction score
16
As you can see in this picture:
pAyHm.jpg
This explanation "relation between the normal and the slope of a curve" is formulated here:

$$\frac{1}{\rho} \frac{d\rho }{d\psi }=\tan\left(\frac{\theta+\psi}{2}\right)$$

I got confused because I don't have the curve equation(regarding the slope of the curve and normal vector) and I am curious to know how the above equation is derived.

First I assume that the normal vector on cylindrical curve is going to obtain via gradian operator:
$$\bigtriangledown F=\frac{\partial F }{\partial r}\hat{ar}+\frac{\partial F }{r\partial \phi}\hat{\phi}+\frac{\partial F }{\partial z}\hat{az}$$
but I don't have the F function, and as you can see the above question the writer assume F as $$\rho$$ that I don't understand where it comes from and why the writer used the only phi component.

I will be grateful if you could help me to obtain the formula based on the curve coordinates.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
@baby_1 what has this to do with textbooks? :wideeyed:
 
Thank you Malawi_glenn,
Yes, it seems the administrators changed the group of my question. My question is part of an article instead of a textbook.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K