The relationship between friction and mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between friction and mass, particularly focusing on static and kinetic friction. Participants explore how mass influences frictional forces and the role of the coefficient of friction, while also considering material properties and surface roughness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the direct proportionality of mass to friction and question the implications of using weight instead of mass. There are inquiries about how material properties affect the coefficient of friction and whether a rough surface always results in higher friction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback and clarifications on various points. Some suggest that the coefficient of friction is not dependent on mass, while others express confusion about the relationship between weight and frictional force. Multiple interpretations of how friction behaves under different conditions are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing debates about the definitions of mass and weight, as well as the effects of surface material and roughness on friction. Some participants reference external sources to support their points, indicating a variety of perspectives on the topic.

George2020
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
How does mass effect coefficient of friction and both static and kinetic friction along a horizontal surface? How does the material affect of a horizontal surface affect coefficient of friction and horizontal and static friction.
Relevant Equations
F= mu x Fn
mu= Ff/Fn
Mass is directly proportional to static and kinetic friction and inversely proportion to the coefficient of friction.
Material affects the coefficient of friction as well as both static and kinetic friction. eg rough surface will have a higher coeffieiceint of friction
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question should refer to weight, not mass.
George2020 said:
Mass is directly proportional to static and kinetic friction
Consider a block resting on a horizontal surface, no other forces applied. What is the frictional force?
George2020 said:
inversely proportion to the coefficient of friction.
How do you arrive at that? (Maybe I can guess.)
George2020 said:
rough surface will have a higher coeffieiceint of friction
Not necessarily.
 
Friction force is a product of coefficient of friction and normal force . However, on a horizontal surface the normal force is mass x gravity. Hence, the relationship between mass and friction is directly proportional.

How does material affect the coefficeint of friction affect and static and kinetic friction? How will a rough material not have a higher coefficient of friction? Please explain
 
George2020 said:
on a horizontal surface the normal force is mass x gravity
Even so, it should refer to weight. Gravity is different in different places.
George2020 said:
Friction force is a product of coefficient of friction and normal force
It's not that simple for static friction. Try to answer my question in post #2.
George2020 said:
How will a rough material not have a higher coefficient of friction?
See e.g. https://www.qualitymag.com/articles...ould-you-make-the-surface-rougher-or-smoother
 
On a horizontal surface the only forces acting are normal force and force of gravity. But if the gravity is constant for different places should increase the mass not increase the friction force and coefficient as well. ?
 
George2020 said:
Friction force is a product of coefficient of friction and normal force .
...
That concept may lead to confusion in the future.
The coefficient is established in experimental way for pair of surfaces of specific material and roughness combination.
It seems to be the same concept, but it is not, in my opinion.

That coefficient is basically telling you up to what percentage of the magnitude of a normal force can become a resistive force that opposes the relative movement of both surfaces.
Two values are found for each combination: the bigger one (static coefficient) is for before the relative movement happens, while the smaller one (dynamic coefficient) is for once there is relative movement between the surfaces.

None of those coefficients are dependent on the mass, weight or pressure on the contact patches, only on the nature of the surfaces.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Thanks for the feedback for clarifying the subject. But if I do not go into much detail and stick to basics, the material should increase both the friction and coefficient of friction. Or else how do you explain why the coefficient is fixed for different material ?
If you increase the weight do you not increase the frictional force as well more for static friction than kinetic friction. Please advise if my understanding is correct .
Thanks
 
George2020 said:
Friction force is a product of coefficient of friction and normal force . However, on a horizontal surface the normal force is mass x gravity. Hence, the relationship between mass and friction is directly proportional.

Really you have ##F_s \leq \mu N##. That just means that ##F_s## is whatever it needs to be to give static equilibrium, up to a maximum threshold.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
George2020 said:
On a horizontal surface the only forces acting are normal force and force of gravity. But if the gravity is constant for different places should increase the mass not increase the friction force and coefficient as well. ?
The coefficient is (nominally at least) a constant depending only on the nature of the surfaces. It does not depend on the normal force.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #10
George2020 said:
Thanks for the feedback for clarifying the subject. But if I do not go into much detail and stick to basics, the material should increase both the friction and coefficient of friction. Or else how do you explain why the coefficient is fixed for different material ?
If you increase the weight do you not increase the frictional force as well more for static friction than kinetic friction. Please advise if my understanding is correct .
Thanks
Sorry, I can't fully understand your last question.
A combination of two materials (at specific temperature) and surface roughness always gives you the same coefficient, for practical terms.

If you change one or both materials, then the value of the coefficient can increase or decrease.
Example: You are pushing a heavy wood piece of furniture over ceramic tile floor, then you insert a sheet of Teflon in between all points of contact in order to push with less effort.

If you want to obtain more friction from a specific combination of two materials and surface roughness, then you apply more normal force upon the surfaces in contact.
Example: When you want to decelerate your car faster, you push harder on the brake pedal, which increases the force that the calipers exert over the brake pads, among which the brake disks slide.

I have mentioned temperature above, because the coefficient for some combinations of two materials changes some with temperature (example: cheap brake pads become less effective when too hot).
 
  • #11
George2020 said:
If you increase the weight do you not increase the frictional force as well more for static friction than kinetic friction.
If you increase the normal force between two sliding surfaces then you increase the kinetic friction.
In the situation you are considering, the normal force is the weight, but if you think of it as the frictional force being proportional to the weight you might fall into the trap of using that when it does not apply.

For static friction, increasing the normal force increases the maximum force of static friction. It does not necessarily increase the actual force of friction.
Consider a block mass m resting on a horizontal surface. A horizontal force F is applied, but this is not enough to slide the block. The frictional force is therefore F. If we put another mass on top to increase the weight, the frictional force is still F.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
904
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K