I dont like CI but lets play by its rules for a while So, in the mainstream CI wavefunction is non physical: it is just our subjective 'knowledge' of the system. So, I use an experimental device: I put a cat inside the box, and press a button. The device inside the box works based on the entanglement of the photon. I measure it on another side. On another side I see the red lamp and I say: Cat is dead. This is how the device was supposed to work. The wavefunction of a cat collapsed to the dead one. Then I open a box and to my surprise I see alive cat! It appears that the guy who helped me to build that device had lied to me, or made a mistake: he connected red wire tothe green lamp and vice versa. Of course you would say: well, nothing strange: the information was incorrect. So when the probability given by the wavefuction after collapse is confirmed by the experiment, it confirms CI. When it contradicts the experiment, then the initial assumptions (about the device) were incorrect. Do you see the problem here? Do proponets of the CI have answers if wavefunction collapses as well based on the false information?