The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This thread discusses the collection and analysis of geological samples, specifically focusing on thin sections obtained from Prof. Rob Verschure's research. Participants explore the microstructural and mesoscopic features of various rock types, including explosion breccias, carbonatites, and gneisses, while sharing personal insights and photographic documentation of their findings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their acquisition of thin sections related to Prof. Verschure's work, highlighting the significance of these samples as a "Rosetta stone" for understanding various geological phenomena.
  • Another participant notes the visual appeal of mesoscopic structures in rocks, emphasizing the importance of labeling samples for better identification during imaging.
  • A participant presents a specific sample classified as a "Tveitan carbonatized damtjernite-like explosion breccia," detailing its composition and characteristics, while referencing a paper that attempts to explain the origin of certain features.
  • Discussion includes a comparison of personal images with published figures from Verschure's work, with emphasis on learning geological observation techniques and the significance of color in mineral identification.
  • A participant shares insights on a sample classified as "sheared gneiss," discussing its unusual features and attempting to calculate the pressure required for quartz deformation, while expressing uncertainty about their results.
  • Questions are raised regarding the appearance of grain boundaries in feldspar compared to quartz, with a request for references on grain deformation and recrystallization processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express individual observations and interpretations of geological samples, but there is no consensus on specific geological processes or the implications of their findings. The discussion remains exploratory and open-ended.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of geological processes and the complexities involved in interpreting microstructural features. There are references to unresolved calculations and the need for further research on specific topics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to geology enthusiasts, students studying petrology, and researchers exploring the characteristics of various rock types and their formation processes.

  • #151
Next sample:

Fen 252.webp


Tinguaite. Altered phonolite (QAPF field 11), Fen complex. Trachytic groundmass of sanidine laths, aegerine needles, and small aggregates of anhedral granular mineral, likely muscovite/paragonite secondary to groundmass nepheline.

DSC_3561.webp


DSC_3562.webp


DSC_3576.webp


DSC_3577.webp


Small phenocrysts of biotite, large phenocrysts of sanidine, often partially altered into natrolite and large blocky phenocrysts of what was likely nepheline, now pseudomorphically altered into disordered microscopic anhedral aggregations of presumably the same mineral (biotite or paragonite) as the groundmass as well as the altered nepheline found in samples Fen 248, 249, and 250; unfortunately, definitive identification is not possible.

Montage3.webp


Montage4.webp


Montage2.webp


Montage.webp


Montage6.webp


AI coughed up the following- keep in mind that the pre-existing country rock, Telemark gniess, has significantly less Aluminum and significantly more Sodium compared to the rest of the rocks on earth, so the gneiss is classified as “peralkaline”. Within the Fen complex, due to the ijolite/carbonatite intrusions, the Fen rocks are usually classified as “silica-undersaturated peralkaline”.

“The alteration of sanidine into natrolite is a hydrothermal process, typically occurring within silica-undersaturated volcanic rocks like phonolites or nepheline syenites. While sanidine itself is a high-temperature potassium-sodium feldspar, its alteration to natrolite—a hydrated sodium-aluminum silicate zeolite—represents a low-temperature, secondary, or "deuteric" alteration event.”
 
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #152
Fen 253.webp


Altered Phonolite (QAPF field 11), Fen complex. Groundmass primarily consists of trachtytic sanidine laths and aggregates of anhedral grains of a mineral, likely cancrinite replacing groundmass nepheline. In addition, minor amounts of aegirine needles, and opaques are present.

Montage5.webp


Montage6.webp


Blocky rectangular and hexagonal nepheline phenocrysts have pseudomorphically altered into cancrinite, and sanidine phenocrysts have a dusty/perthic appearance. In some places, the sanidine has partially altered into small elongated anhedral grains of (likely) orthoclase and in other, sanidine phenocrysts have partially altered to microcline.

Montage4.webp


Montage3.webp


Montage2.webp

(Along the right side is the edge of the sample.)

Montage.webp

It’s unclear if enough aegirine is present to classify this rock as a Tinguaite.

Image triplet: In the center of the field of view, a pair of diamond-shaped titanite crystals, partially oxidized to ilmenite, leucoxene, and calcite. At bottom, carbonate (probably calcite) and titanite (with some ilmenite opaques) have pseudomorphically replaced a mineral with cleavage pattern similar to biotite, but I can’t identify the original mineral.

DSC_2790.webp


DSC_2791.webp


DSC_2792.webp


“Cancrinite commonly forms as a secondary alteration product of nepheline in alkaline-rich igneous rocks, such as nepheline syenites, typically through low-temperature hydrothermal processes or subsolidus reactions. This alteration occurs via the interaction of nepheline with CO2- and alkali-rich fluids. The transformation, which occurs in the presence of water, involves the addition of Ca, Na and carbonate to the nepheline structure. The alteration typically occurs in the subsolidus range, with hydrothermal fluids (often around 400 - 500°C or lower) supplying the necessary components."
 
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
  • #153
Next up:

Fen 254.webp


Altered Tinguaite/Phonolite (QAPF field 11), Fen complex. This rock has an appearance very similar to Fen 252. Trachytic groundmass of sanidine laths, aegerine needles, and small aggregates of anhedral granular mineral, likely paragonite replacing groundmass nepheline.

Montage6.webp


Small phenocrysts of biotite with opaques (either magnetite or ilmenite), large phenocrysts of sanidine, some with Baveno twinning, often partially altered into natrolite, and large blocky phenocrysts of what was likely nepheline, now pseudomorphically altered into disordered microscopic anhedral aggregations of presumably the same mineral (paragonite) as the altered nepheline found in samples Fen 248, 249, and 250; unfortunately, definitive identification (by me) is not (currently) possible.

Montage.webp


Montage2.webp


Montage3.webp


Montage4.webp


Montage5.webp


“The alteration of nepheline into paragonite represents a metamorphic or hydrothermal process, often occurring in Na-rich alkaline environments. Paragonite, a sodium-rich mica, forms from nepheline through hydration and silica uptake, often during the alteration stage of nepheline syenites or related pegmatites”

DSC_2815.webp


DSC_2816.webp


DSC_2817.webp
 
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
  • #154
Next up:

Fen 255.webp


Altered Tinguaite/Phonolite (QAPF field 11), Fen complex. Similar appearance as Fen 253. Blocky phenocrysts of cancrinite, likely as pseudomorphic altered nepheline. Phenocrysts of sanidine heavily altered (dusty appearance, perthic texture). Groundmass is disordered, consisting of agglomerated anhedral cancritine grains, both laths and anhedral grains of feldspar, and irregularly shaped grains of green aegirine. What would typically be aegirine needles instead have a highly degraded/corroded appearance, unclear if this rock would be classified as a Tinguaite.

Montage2.webp


Montage.webp

Above image pair: upper right corner is dusty (PP) sanidine; lower right corner is cancritine (pseudomorphic altered nepheline); groundmass is (approximately) along the the left half of the frame, and in between cancritine and groundmass, a thin layer of anhedral grains of calcite. Within the groundmass, grain of blue mineral is either fluorite, lazurite, or haüyne.

Large isotropic grain, likely sodalite:
Montage4.webp


Several “phenocrysts” consisting of a distinct outer shell (dark hematite and feldspar laths, mostly dusty in PP) surrounding an interior region, consisting of a mixture of calcite and needle-like aragonite (a polymorph of calcite):
DSC_3663.webp


DSC_3664.webp


Red-brown “smoke”, likely hematite:
Montage5.webp


Thin veinlet of unknown mineral- possibly hematite, here traversing cancrinite; a zone of calcite surrounds the veinlet.
DSC_2876.webp


DSC_2877.webp


Montage3.webp

Isotropic blue mineral is either fluorite, lazurite, or haüyne.

Also present in the sample when viewed through epi-darkfield: purple-ish ilmenite; some crystals of titanate have pseudomorphically altered to ilmenite. Silvery rhomboids and truncated hexagons of magnetite.
 
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: Bystander