General formulae for the roots of a cubic equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on finding general formulae for the roots of a cubic equation of the form $$ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d = 0$$. Participants explore various transformations and substitutions to derive the roots, addressing both real and complex solutions, as well as the implications of the discriminant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant rewrites the cubic equation using a change of variables and applies Vieta's substitution, leading to a quadratic equation in terms of $$w^3$$.
  • It is noted that the discriminant $$\Delta_{_{1}}^{2}-4\Delta_{_{0}}^{3}$$ determines the nature of the roots: three distinct real roots, one real root with a pair of complex conjugates, or three identical real roots.
  • Questions are raised about how to find additional roots when $$\Delta_{_{1}}^{2}-4\Delta_{_{0}}^{3} > 0$$ or $$< 0$$, and concerns are expressed about the potential for having more roots than expected from a cubic equation.
  • Another participant reiterates that a cubic function will have one real root and a pair of complex conjugate roots or three real roots, with the possibility of identical roots under certain conditions.
  • One participant critiques the Wikipedia article on cubic functions for not providing sufficient guidance on obtaining distinct roots or addressing the issue of having too many roots.
  • A later reply points out that substituting $$z$$ with $$w+\frac{1}{w}$$ effectively doubles the degree of the polynomial, which could lead to additional solutions that do not correspond to the original cubic equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the nature of the roots of cubic equations but express differing views on how to derive these roots and the implications of transformations used in the process. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific methods to find distinct roots and the potential for having more roots than expected.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the dependence on the discriminant and the implications of transformations on the degree of the polynomial, which may lead to confusion about the number of roots.

Gabriel Maia
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone. I'm sorry for the long thread. If you don't want to read all the introductory stuff I will mark the part towards the end where my questions are located. I'm trying to find the general formulae for the roots of the equation

$$ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d = 0$$

By using some changes of variable (which does not really matter now) I was able to rewrite this equation as

$$z^3 - \frac{\Delta_{_{0}}}{3a^2}z+\frac{\Delta_{_{1}}}{27a^3} = 0$$

I used then the Vieta's substitution

$$z = w + \frac{\Delta_{_{0}}}{9a^2w}$$

to obtain the following:

$$(w^3)^2 + \frac{\Delta_{_{1}}}{27a^3}w^3 + \frac{\Delta_{_{0}}^{3}}{729a^6} = 0$$

This is a quadratic equation on w^3 with roots:

$$ w^3 = -\frac{1}{27a^3}\,\left(\frac{\Delta_{_{1}} \mp \sqrt{\Delta_{_{1}}^{2}-4\Delta_{_{0}}^{3}}}{2}\right)$$

Now, if \Delta_{_{1}}^{2}-4\Delta_{_{0}}^{3} = 0, then w has three possible values for each sign and all these six values are the same.

If \Delta_{_{1}}^{2}-4\Delta_{_{0}}^{3} &gt; 0 there are three distinct values for each sign in w, making a total of six distinct roots.

Finally, if \Delta_{_{1}}^{2}-4\Delta_{_{0}}^{3} &lt; 0 we will have, I think, three different complex roots for each sign in w, right?
{\Large AND \,\,\, NOW, \,\,\, FOR \,\,\, THE \,\,\, REAL \,\,\, QUESTIONS:}
- In the case where \Delta_{_{1}}^{2}-4\Delta_{_{0}}^{3} &gt; 0 there is one obvious root, but how can I find the others?

- In the case where \Delta_{_{1}}^{2}-4\Delta_{_{0}}^{3} &lt; 0 there is, again, one obvious root, but how can I find the others? And more... how can I be sure they're all different from each other?- If there are at least two distinct roots for each possible sign of w we have a total of four distinct values. But since each value of w gives one value of z, because they are related by

$$z = w + \frac{\Delta_{_{0}}}{9a^2w},$$

I would have four distinct values of z but it is the root of a cubic equation so there should be at most three distinct values. What is going on here? Thank you very much.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since the cubic has an odd power, you are going to have one real root and a pair of complex conjugate roots or three real roots. Under some conditions, the three real roots may all be identical.

For more info on the roots of a cubic:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_function
 
SteamKing said:
Since the cubic has an odd power, you are going to have one real root and a pair of complex conjugate roots or three real roots. Under some conditions, the three real roots may all be identical.

For more info on the roots of a cubic:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_function
I've read the wikipedia article but it's of no help. It mostly throw things at you but doesn't say how to obtain the distinct roots and neither does it helps with the problem of having too many roots.
 
SteamKing said:
Since the cubic has an odd power, you are going to have one real root and a pair of complex conjugate roots or three real roots. Under some conditions, the three real roots may all be identical.

For more info on the roots of a cubic:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_function
This assumes all the coefficients are real.
 
Where you substitute z with ##w+\frac 1 w## you double the degree of the polynomial and your cubic becomes of degree 6. The equation in w can have a solution that is not shared by the original cubic in z, e.g., being of degree 6 it may have 4 real solutions plus a complex conjugate pair.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
751
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K