The Stefan-Boltzmann Law and Sunspots

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Stefan-Boltzmann Law has been extensively validated through empirical testing, confirming its accuracy in predicting thermal radiation. The discussion highlights a discrepancy between the expected luminosity of the sun's surface and that of sunspots, with the photosphere being 10,000 times brighter than a sunspot umbra. Current scientific consensus attributes this phenomenon to magnetic fields rather than alternative elements or states of matter. For a deeper understanding, consulting a textbook on stellar physics is recommended.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Stefan-Boltzmann Law
  • Basic knowledge of stellar physics
  • Familiarity with concepts of luminosity and temperature in astrophysics
  • Awareness of magnetic fields and their effects in solar phenomena
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Stefan-Boltzmann Law in detail
  • Explore the physics of sunspots and their magnetic properties
  • Read a comprehensive textbook on stellar physics
  • Investigate the role of magnetism in solar dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysics students, and anyone interested in the mechanisms of solar radiation and sunspot phenomena.

K. Doc Holiday
Messages
32
Reaction score
13
The Stefan-Boltzmann Law

Question: Is this law proven to be true? If so, then what about sunspots?

The surface of the sun is roughly double the temperature of an umbra which means it should be 16 times brighter according to this law. It isn't.

The luminosity of the photosphere is 10,000 times the luminosity (1,000,000%) of a sunspot umbra. That seems like a huge discrepancy. Could something else be at play? Could sunspots be a different element and/or a different state of matter?

I know current theory blames magnetism. In order for that to be the mitigating factor wouldn't sunspots have to generate their own magnetic field? Can hydrogen do that?
Just asking.

Respectfully
Doc Holiday
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
K. Doc Holiday said:
Is this law proven to be true?
In science you never ”prove” anything. You test your theory by checking whether the predictions it makes match your experimental result. In the case of the Stefan-Boltzmann law, it has been extremely well tested and found accurate.

K. Doc Holiday said:
If so, then what about sunspots?
What about them? The physics of sunspots are also well understood. I suggest reading a textbook on stellar physics rather than making assumptions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
@K. Doc Holiday could you please provide sources for those numbers so we can tell if you have properly interpreted what you are reading.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K