The shape of the body in Stefan Boltzmann Law modern use

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Stefan Boltzmann Law, particularly in relation to the shape of the body emitting radiation. Participants explore whether the assumption of a spherical shape is necessary for the law's application across various contexts, including astrophysical and terrestrial examples.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the Stefan Boltzmann Law can be applied to various bodies, but question whether these bodies need to be approximated as spheres for accurate application.
  • One participant asserts that the shape does not matter unless the object is small compared to the wavelength of radiation.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on what constitutes an object that is not small compared to the wavelength, leading to a discussion about the visibility of objects and their relation to the law.
  • There is a mention that quantum mechanics may affect the applicability of the law to very small particles, but this is not elaborated upon in detail.
  • Participants express confusion about the implications of shape on the application of the law, with some emphasizing that the law itself is about radiation per surface area and does not inherently depend on shape.
  • It is noted that while the law can be applied to non-spherical objects, one cannot use the formula for the surface area of a sphere unless the object is roughly spherical.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the assumption of a spherical shape is necessary for applying the Stefan Boltzmann Law. There are competing views regarding the importance of shape in the law's application, leading to ongoing clarification and debate.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of "small" in relation to wavelength and the implications of shape on the calculations involved in applying the law.

george95
Messages
41
Reaction score
6
Hello,

It looks like Stefan Boltzmann Law can be used for a lot of different purposes: to calculate the temperature of stars, sun, temperature of the Earth's sky, temperature of particular surface, wall, the radiation emitted by the body by knowing its temperature, and so on.

What confuses me is: in all these modern examples of the use of Stefan Boltzmann Law, there is an initial assumption that the black or gray body which emits the energy is approximated to be a sphere? Is this correct or not?

Is it crucial for the Stefan Boltzmann Law, that the body in question is a sphere, so that it equally emits the energy in all directions?

Thank you for the reply.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The shape does not matter at all, unless the whole object is small compared to the wavelength of radiation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: george95
Thank you mfb.
Would give an example of an object which is not small compared to the wavelength of its radiation?
My apology for the personal ignorance.
 
Literally everything you can see.

The wavelength range of infrared radiation is micrometers, and visible light is between 0.4 and 0.8 micrometers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: george95
Thank you mfb.

How does a ball of certain dimension relate with the wavelength it radiates?
I still do not understand you, I apologize for that.
 
Ignore the comment on size. It was a remark about an irrelevant special case. If you take a really tiny dust particle or even individual atoms, it won't follow the law.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: george95
Why is that so? Why wouldn't a tiny dust particle which emits energy, follow the law? Because it is not visible by the naked eye?
The Stefan Boltzmann Law is applicable only to the objects which can be seen by a naked eye?
 
george95 said:
Why wouldn't a tiny dust particle which emits energy, follow the law?
Quantum mechanics. But I really don't think going into more detail there would help. This has nothing to do with the human eye.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: george95
Thank you.
But I am still not sure I understand you.
We can apply the Stefan Boltzmann Law to an object of any shape, as long as its size is not smaller than the size of the wavelength of the radiation it emits.

But when we apply the Stefan Boltzmann Law to that object, do we approximate its shape to be a sphere or not?
Forgive me if my questions sound repetitive, but the way I understood your reply:
The shape does not matter at all, unless the whole object is small compared to the wavelength of radiation.
is: Stefan Boltzmann Law can be applied to an object of any shape...

But when we apply the Stefan Boltzmann Law to an object of any shape, do we assume it to be a sphere, or we do not?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
george95 said:
as long as its size is not smaller than the size of the wavelength of the radiation it emits.
Please, forget that I ever made that comment. I see it just leads to confusion.

george95 said:
But when we apply the Stefan Boltzmann Law to that object, do we approximate its shape to be a sphere or not?
What exactly do you mean by "apply the Stefan Boltzmann Law"? The law does not depend on the shape of the object at all, it is a law about radiation per surface area. If you want to calculate the total amount of radiation emitted by the sun, for example, then you have to take care about the shape (and the size!), but that is a different thing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: george95
  • #11
What exactly do you mean by "apply the Stefan Boltzmann Law"?

"Apply" as Stefan Boltzmann Law can be used to calculate either the temperature of the particular body by knowing the radiation it emits, or the radiation it emits by knowing the its temperature.

The law does not depend on the shape of the object at all, it is a law about radiation per surface area.

What confuses me is that on a lot of examples of Stefan Boltzmann Law, the black or gray body is presented as a sphere.
So does that mean that even though the law does not depend on the shape of the object, when it's applied to the object, is it assumed that the shape of the object is a sphere?
 
  • #12
george95 said:
"Apply" as Stefan Boltzmann Law can be used to calculate either the temperature of the particular body by knowing the radiation it emits, or the radiation it emits by knowing the its temperature.
Then you have to know size and shape of the object to some extent. Clearly larger objects emit more radiation in total.
That is not just the Stefan-Boltzmann law any more, it is the law integrated over the outer surface.
george95 said:
when it's applied to the object, is it assumed that the shape of the object is a sphere?
Not necessarily. You can assume that if you know that the object is roughly spherical, otherwise you cannot.
 
  • #13
Not necessarily. You can assume that if you know that the object is roughly spherical, otherwise you cannot.

And the fact that "you cannot" assume that the object's shape is not a sphere, does not prevent one to apply the Stefan-Boltzmann law to that object?
 
Last edited:
  • #14
It does not prevent you from applying it, but you cannot use ##4 \pi r^2## for its surface area.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: george95
  • #15
Thank you mfb.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K