Understanding the Stefan-Boltzmann Law (when the surroundings are hotter)

  • #1
JC2000
186
16
TL;DR Summary
1.My book tells me that given ##T_{surroundings}##, and ##T## of the object radiating heat, the law is expressed as ##H = \sigma A (T^4 - T^4_{surroundings})##.

2. Relating Newton's Law of Cooling, Conduction, and Stefan-Boltzmann Law

3. Is emissivity the same as Stefan's constant or is it ## e * \sigma## where ##e## varies, depending on the material?
1.If so what would the law mean if ##T_{surroundings}>T##?

2. Stefan-Boltzmann Law is formulated as ##H = A\sigma T^4## where ##H## is the energy emitted per unit time, ##A## is the area of the object, ##T## is the absolute temperature of the object and (3.) I am unclear about whether ##\sigma## represents emissivity or ##e*\sigma## represents Stefan's constant.

My book also defines Conduction (as the time rate of heat flow for a given temperature difference), as ##H = kA \frac {T_c - T_d}{L}## where ##H## is the rate of flow of heat (heat current), ##A## is the area of cross-section and ##L## is the length between the two points being considered, ##T_c - T_d## the temperature difference between the points.

Newton's Law of Cooling is stated as a special case of Stefan-Boltzmann Law where the temperature difference is very small and is formulated as ##\frac {dQ}{dt} = k(T_2 - T_1)##.

I feel that the three must be somehow interrelated, am I correct in assuming this? If so, how?

3. Lastly is emissivity the same as Stefan's constant or is it ## e * \sigma## where ##e## varies, depending on the material?

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi JC
1. the object has a net absorption of radiation
2. e represents emissivity, σ represents the Stefan - Boltzmann constant
3. ε = 1 for a black body. For all real materials, it varies from 0 to 1, and can be frequency dependent.

Newton's Law of cooling - if the temperature difference is large, then radiation effects should be taken into account
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Dale, JC2000 and DrClaude
  • #3
1. So ##H## represents the rate of absorption? (If so, shouldn't heat absorption have a positive sign and hence rate of heat absorption should also have a positive sign?)
2. Thanks that makes it clear!
3. So, it is safe to say that Stefan-Boltzmann's law could be used in place of the other two formulas while the other two are special cases (for small T differences we have Newton's Law of Cooling and the formula of conduction is when heat transfer is occurring within a substance). Thus Stefan-Boltzmann's law could be used to find the rate of heat transfer in all cases?
 
  • #4
JC2000 said:
1. So ##H## represents the rate of absorption? (If so, shouldn't heat absorption have a positive sign and hence rate of heat absorption should also have a positive sign?)
2. Thanks that makes it clear!
3. So, it is safe to say that Stefan-Boltzmann's law could be used in place of the other two formulas while the other two are special cases (for small T differences we have Newton's Law of Cooling and the formula of conduction is when heat transfer is occurring within a substance). Thus Stefan-Boltzmann's law could be used to find the rate of heat transfer in all cases?
1. In which direction you assign heat flow, in or out, would be case dependent.
Example - the sun outputs X amount of radiation, so one would consider that a positive value for the sun.
the Earth receives Y amount of heat flux, so one would consider that as a positive value for the earth.

3. probably not. Conduction and convection are heat transfers by contact, not by radiation.
 
  • Like
Likes JC2000

Similar threads

Back
Top