The Uncertainty Relation for Position and Momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the uncertainty relation in quantum mechanics, specifically regarding the position and momentum of a golf ball. The original poster presents a problem involving the minimum possible energy of a golf ball determined within a specific position uncertainty.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the uncertainty principle to calculate the minimum kinetic energy of the golf ball and questions whether rest energy should be included in the analysis. Other participants engage by questioning the relevance of rest energy in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring the implications of including rest energy versus focusing solely on kinetic energy. Some guidance has been offered regarding the accessibility of rest energy in this scenario, suggesting a focus on kinetic energy alone.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not involve relativistic speeds and that the context of the question may limit the relevance of rest energy.

knowLittle
Messages
307
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


The position of a 60-gram golf ball sitting on a tee is
determined within +- 1μm. What is its minimum possi-
ble energy? Moving at the speed corresponding to this
kinetic energy, how far would the ball move in a year?

Homework Equations


## K\geq\dfrac {\hbar ^{2}} {2ma^{2}} ## Minimum Possible Kinetic E.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have solved it using the above equation. But, I wonder, if I should consider rest energy as well.

When they ask the second question, I sort of think that they only want this minimum kinetic E.
Any ideas?

Danke.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just the kinetic energy is interesting here.
 
Why?
 
You can calculate both if you like, but the rest energy cannot be accessed here (as you do not have an anti-golfball), and you are not dealing with relativistic velocities.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K