The Volume Of A Layer Of Lead Of Uniform Thickness(word problem)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on modeling the volume of a layer of lead shielding around a rectangular prism container measuring 2m by 3m by 4m. The volume function is defined as V(t) = (4 + 2t)(3 + 2t)(2 + 2t) - 24, where t represents the thickness of the lead layer. Participants confirm the correctness of the solution, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that the volume approaches zero as the thickness approaches zero. The discussion highlights the need for rigorous definitions of variables in mathematical problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of volume calculation for rectangular prisms
  • Familiarity with algebraic expressions and functions
  • Knowledge of limits and continuity in mathematical functions
  • Basic problem-solving skills in geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of limits in calculus, focusing on how they apply to volume calculations
  • Study the properties of polynomial functions and their behavior as variables approach specific values
  • Learn about dimensional analysis and its application in real-world problems
  • Practice additional word problems involving geometric shapes and volume calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying geometry, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in applying algebraic functions to real-world problems involving volume and dimensions.

Plutonium88
Messages
173
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A container in the form of a rectangular prism measuring 2m by 3m by 4m is covered with a layer of lead shielding of uniform thickness. Model the volume of the shielding as a function of its thickness. Treat the shelding as a hollow rectangular prism. DO NOT SIMPLIFY.



Homework Equations


V=lxwxh


The Attempt at a Solution



I found

l = 4m w = 3m h = 2m

when i drew each shape as a 2d shape. I noticed that the layer of lead was an equal (Uniform) layer around. So i labeled one unit of thickness, as t.

Thus all sides ended up having a layer on either side...

i came to conclude that the new measurements were.

L2=4 + 2t W2= 3 + 2t H2 = 2 + 2t

and since its hollow..

V(t) = L2*W2*H2 - Lwh

V(t) = (4+2t)(3+2t)(2+2t) - 4*3*2 <====(Or 24)




Can anyone tell me if this solution appears to be correct, and also point me out if I'm forgetting where any layers thickness maybe ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine to me.
 
I think your answer looks good. I think you chose what your variable represented nicely and set up your function good. You can always check yourself in these situations to see if your answer makes sense. Does your equation make sense? In this case, the volume of the thickness should approach 0 as t approaches zero, and it does; so your equation seems reasonable.

Only "qualm" I would have is that you "found" l, h, and w. It would be better to let l, h, and w be the values they are, unless they specifically gave you equations for finding them. Just a little nitpick, I'm sure your teacher won't mind but it just makes it a little more rigorous.

But, again, for word problems there is usually a way to check and see if your solution makes sense. Let something get really small or really big and see if the answer makes sense, in this case it does!
 
scurty said:
I think your answer looks good. I think you chose what your variable represented nicely and set up your function good. You can always check yourself in these situations to see if your answer makes sense. Does your equation make sense? In this case, the volume of the thickness should approach 0 as t approaches zero, and it does; so your equation seems reasonable.

Only "qualm" I would have is that you "found" l, h, and w. It would be better to let l, h, and w be the values they are, unless they specifically gave you equations for finding them. Just a little nitpick, I'm sure your teacher won't mind but it just makes it a little more rigorous.

But, again, for word problems there is usually a way to check and see if your solution makes sense. Let something get really small or really big and see if the answer makes sense, in this case it does!



Thanks a lot guys i really appreciate it.

and so in terms of what you're saying with the approaching business.

i would know my answer shouldn't be correct if it was a negative number, cause volume can't be negative?

or like, can you explain to me a little more in depthly abuot the approaching bussiness and the equation.?
 
Plutonium88 said:
Thanks a lot guys i really appreciate it.

and so in terms of what you're saying with the approaching business.

i would know my answer shouldn't be correct if it was a negative number, cause volume can't be negative?

or like, can you explain to me a little more in depthly abuot the approaching bussiness and the equation.?

I'm not sure there's really much you need to check. It's a straighforward problem and you did it in a straightforward way. I really wouldn't worry about it.
 
Dick said:
I'm not sure there's really much you need to check. It's a straighforward problem and you did it in a straightforward way. I really wouldn't worry about it.

Yea you`re right no need to complicate things. I Really appreciate that you checked my answer and for your input man. It means a lot to me man keep up the great help man.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
35K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K