einstein1921 said:
Thank you,Amok.your answer is very helpful to me.would you please tell me that p_x corresponds to m=1 or m=-1 and why?
again thanks.
It is more of a convention thing than anything; there are no strict relationships between the two. You can define whatever.
That being said, the most common convention in quantum chemistry has the real solid harmonics beeing approximated like this in terms of cartesians:
AngMom L = 0
S(0,m=+0) = + 1.00000
AngMom L = 1
S(1,m=-1) = + 1.00000 y
S(1,m=+0) = + 1.00000 z
S(1,m=+1) = + 1.00000 x
AngMom L = 2
S(2,m=-2) = + 1.73205 x y
S(2,m=-1) = + 1.73205 y z
S(2,m=+0) = + 1.00000 z^2 - 0.50000 y^2 - 0.50000 x^2
S(2,m=+1) = + 1.73205 x z
S(2,m=+2) = - 0.86603 y^2 + 0.86603 x^2
AngMom L = 3
S(3,m=-3) = - 0.79057 y^3 + 2.37171 x^2 y
S(3,m=-2) = + 3.87298 x y z
S(3,m=-1) = + 2.44949 y z^2 - 0.61237 y^3 - 0.61237 x^2 y
S(3,m=+0) = + 1.00000 z^3 - 1.50000 y^2 z - 1.50000 x^2 z
S(3,m=+1) = + 2.44949 x z^2 - 0.61237 x y^2 - 0.61237 x^3
S(3,m=+2) = - 1.93649 y^2 z + 1.93649 x^2 z
S(3,m=+3) = - 2.37171 x y^2 + 0.79057 x^3
This is what you will usually get when using "spherical" basis functions in a chemical electronic structure program, and correspondingly also what most plots and chemistry books refer to.