Theoretical physics or astrophysics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for choosing between theoretical physics and astrophysics/astronomy/cosmology as fields of study. Participants explore the nature of these fields, educational pathways, and career considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of "theoretical physics" as a distinct field, suggesting it is vague.
  • Another participant recommends obtaining a basic formal education in physics and gaining research experience in preferred fields before applying to graduate school.
  • It is noted that in the UK, there are distinctions between physics, astrophysics, and theoretical physics in undergraduate programs, affecting course selection.
  • One suggestion emphasizes making career decisions based on personal interests and preferences rather than solely on field designation.
  • A participant raises the importance of job availability in chosen fields, sharing a personal experience of shifting from theoretical fields with limited job prospects to more computationally oriented areas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of theoretical physics and its distinction from other fields. There is no consensus on which field is more prosperous or preferable, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to choosing a career path.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the variability in educational structures and job markets across different regions and fields, indicating that decisions may depend on personal circumstances and local opportunities.

cwrn
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am soon to apply for university and I am not quite sure what I want to study. Theoretical physics and astrophysics/astronomy/cosmology all seem like very interesting fields of physics to me. How do I go about when I choose my career path? Which one of the fields has been more prospering than the other lately?

I hope this is the place to ask these kinds of questions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Theoretical physics is vague and isn't a field.

https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=3727

Zz
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Get a basic formal basic education in physics, then you do whatever you can to get research experience in the field(s) you like, and eventually try applying to graduate school for your chosen field of research.

If you're in the UK where there are actual distinctions between physics/astrophysics/theoretical physics bachelors, the courses you will take will differ slightly. At the university I am at(as an exchange student), the straight physics majors do more lab courses while the theoreticians take 1-2 more math courses, 1 more programming course, and dynamical systems (Hamilton-Jacobi theory and such). Those in astrophysics naturally have relevant courses, but all three can take courses from any specialty.

This can vary widely though, as at my home university (physics only), all of these subjects (and more) are compulsory.
 
"Theoretical astrophysics/astronomy/cosmology" seems to be the obvious choice. That said, I strongly advice making career decisions based on "I like/dislike to do ..." (e.g. "like to write small programs", "like helping people", "like/dislike sitting on a computer the whole day", "like/dislike solving equations", ...) rather than "I want to work in the field of ...".
 
Are you applying as an undergraduate or graduate? (It sounds like undergraduate especially due to the lack of exposure to frame it as "Theoretical physics or astrophysics")

If so then you are applying to the university as a whole or just the school that houses sciences but either way you don't have to decide yet. Apply then take classes in both and try research in the one that interests you the most and see if you like it.
 
Whatever field you choose make sure that there's a lot some jobs available in that field. I originally planned on pursuing some hardcore theory fields such as strings, mathematical physics, and even LQG. I quickly found that there are practically no jobs in those fields and changed to something still theoretical but with a heavy computational flavor. If things don't work out exactly as planned I'll always have my CS skills to fall back on.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K