Theoretical Physics vs Maths/Physics Undergrad Degree

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision of whether to continue with a Theoretical Physics degree or switch to a Joint Degree in Maths/Physics. Participants explore the implications of each choice on future studies, particularly in relation to advanced mathematics and its relevance to theoretical physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster (OP) expresses concern that the mathematics content in the Theoretical Physics degree may not be sufficient for pursuing a PhD in Theoretical Physics.
  • Some participants suggest that the current level of mathematics may be adequate unless the OP aims to become a mathematician.
  • One participant shares their experience of a joint degree, stating that the mathematics and physics courses felt disjointed and that the lack of advanced physics courses could hinder preparation for a theoretical physics career.
  • The OP questions whether focusing on advanced mathematics courses like Topology and Differential Geometry is more beneficial than taking advanced physics courses such as General Relativity.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of physics courses for a career in physics, suggesting that essential mathematics is often taught within those courses.
  • A later reply proposes that the OP could learn the mathematics independently, arguing that self-study may be more effective than formal education in mathematics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the adequacy of the mathematics content in the Theoretical Physics degree and the value of pursuing a joint degree. There is no consensus on whether advanced mathematics or advanced physics courses are more critical for future studies in theoretical physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding the relationship between mathematics and physics courses, the adequacy of current mathematics training, and the potential for independent study. These factors remain unresolved and depend on individual educational contexts.

tarnhelm
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I'm studying for a Theoretical Physics degree in the UK, and I have to decide this year if I should stick with that or switch over to a Joint Degree in Maths/Physics. So far, in Maths, I've done calculus up to multivariable and vector calculus, linear algebra, intro do real analysis, intro to pure maths (number theory, groups etc). If I stick with Theoretical Physics, the Maths content of the remainder of my degree will be two Mathematical Methods courses, covering PDEs, ODEs, a small amount of Complex Analysis etc; and a Numerical Methods course.

I really don't think this is enough! There's not much flexibility but I may be able to convince them to let take some courses in the Maths department: a more advanced Analysis course, Intro to Complex Analysis, Dynamical Systems, and either Abstract Algebra or Intro to Topology and Metric Spaces.

The other option is to do a joint degree, in which case I can add more Maths courses still like Differential Geometry, more differential equations courses, and more advanced Analysis, but I'll have to drop a second advanced QM course, General Relativity and a physics course called Groups and Symmetries.

So my questions are:
Given that I'm interested in going into Theoretical Physics as a Phd, which is the better option (especially if they tell me I can't study all the maths courses outlined in the second paragraph)? E.g. would it be better to do Topology and Differential Geometry in Maths, than to do undergraduate GR which would probably have less advanced Maths than the Differential Geometry course? Basically, should I focus on getting good at advanced Maths now, or at doing more advanced courses from a Physics perspective?
And if I do study the Maths courses in the second paragraph, would it be better to do Abstract Algebra or Intro to Topology and Metric Spaces?

Thanks for any advice!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like enough mathematics to me, unless you *really* want to become a mathematician! If not, any more mathematics you might need for you theoretical physics PhD you can learn when you're doing your PhD.

I did a joint degree in Maths/Physics, and it was a big mistake. The maths had little relation to the physics and vice versa, so the course felt very disjointed - as you have recognised (!) you might end up doing differential geometry, and then GR at a lower level. So you end up confused & frustrated, missing an Advanced QM course, and not so well prepared for the next stage in your theoretical physics career...
 
Last edited:
tarnhelm said:
I'm studying for a Theoretical Physics degree in the UK, and I have to decide this year if I should stick with that or switch over to a Joint Degree in Maths/Physics. So far, in Maths, I've done calculus up to multivariable and vector calculus, linear algebra, intro do real analysis, intro to pure maths (number theory, groups etc). If I stick with Theoretical Physics, the Maths content of the remainder of my degree will be two Mathematical Methods courses, covering PDEs, ODEs, a small amount of Complex Analysis etc; and a Numerical Methods course.

I really don't think this is enough! There's not much flexibility but I may be able to convince them to let take some courses in the Maths department: a more advanced Analysis course, Intro to Complex Analysis, Dynamical Systems, and either Abstract Algebra or Intro to Topology and Metric Spaces.

The other option is to do a joint degree, in which case I can add more Maths courses still like Differential Geometry, more differential equations courses, and more advanced Analysis, but I'll have to drop a second advanced QM course, General Relativity and a physics course called Groups and Symmetries.

So my questions are:
Given that I'm interested in going into Theoretical Physics as a Phd, which is the better option (especially if they tell me I can't study all the maths courses outlined in the second paragraph)? E.g. would it be better to do Topology and Differential Geometry in Maths, than to do undergraduate GR which would probably have less advanced Maths than the Differential Geometry course? Basically, should I focus on getting good at advanced Maths now, or at doing more advanced courses from a Physics perspective?
And if I do study the Maths courses in the second paragraph, would it be better to do Abstract Algebra or Intro to Topology and Metric Spaces?

Thanks for any advice!

I would stick with just Theoretical Physics. I don't think they would have designed that degree where it wouldn't prepare you for future studies in theoretical physics.

If I had that option at my school, I would probably do it, but instead I am going with a double major in physics and math. The thing you really have to remember is, physics courses are the most important for your career in physics. A lot of times, they end up teaching you the math you really need to know in the physics courses you are in. I would never substitute a math course applicable to physics over a core physics course such as QM.
 
a naive suggestion for you,you can learn those courses alone.actually to learn mathematics is to discuss with yourself and it's better if you are alone.academy cannot teach mathematics,i think.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K