Theoretical Possibility of "Opposite" Gravitational Mass?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion explores the theoretical concept of two types of gravitational mass, termed Д - mass and Ξ - mass, proposing that like masses attract while unlike masses repel, akin to electric charges. The author suggests that Ξ - mass could cause objects to "fall up," maintaining the same inertial mass as Д - mass. However, the consensus is that the existence of Ξ - mass contradicts the principles of General Relativity, particularly the equivalence principle, which asserts that all masses follow the same geodesics. Previous discussions confirm that negative gravitational mass is deemed impossible within this framework.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity principles
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic knowledge of electric charge interactions
  • Concept of inertial mass vs. gravitational mass
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of negative mass in theoretical physics
  • Study the equivalence principle in General Relativity
  • Explore baryon asymmetry and its relevance to mass types
  • Investigate experimental evidence for gravitational anomalies
USEFUL FOR

Theoretical physicists, cosmologists, and students interested in advanced concepts of gravitational theory and General Relativity.

greswd
Messages
764
Reaction score
20
This is an unusual idea that I have been entertaining for some time, and I can't find anything about it online.
However, it is so simple that someone must have conceived it before.

First, I will elaborate my idea, then I will ask if it possible within the framework of General Relativity.

There are two types of electric charge, positive and negative. Like charges repel, unlike charges attract.

Could there be two types of gravitational mass? Let's call them Д - mass and Ξ - mass.
They could a follow a similar but opposite rule to electric charges: like masses attract, and unlike masses repel.

We assume that both Д and Ξ masses have the same inertial masses.

Д - mass is the type of mass that we're all made out of, our bodies, our planets, our solar system. Ξ - mass would be the"opposite" type of mass.

Like masses attract, so we see that every bit of Д - mass gravitationally attracts every other bit of Д - mass. Using Newton's laws, we can obtain Galileo's Law of Falling Bodies, which is the basis of Einstein's equivalence principle.

Inertial masses remain the same. Falling objects on a planet made out of Ξ - mass would be kinematically indistinguishable from one made out of Д - mass.Let's say one day a meteorite crashes onto Earth. It is a relatively ordinary meteorite, except that embedded within it are chunks of very pure Ξ - mass. When such a chunk is pried out, it falls up! It would fall towards the sky and keep going.

If we measure the acceleration of the up-falling chunks, we would see that it is also 9.81 ms-2.

If we combine two equal Д and Ξ masses, we can produce a gravitationally "neutral" mass, one that can float weightlessly. However, it will still have inertial mass.We have not observed any neutral or Ξ masses. This is similar to the issue of baryon asymmetry. Due to like masses attracting and unlike masses repelling, this could result in increasing separation between the two types, and any Ξ masses in our universe might be really, really, really far away.My final question is whether the existence of this "opposite" Ξ - mass is possible within the framework of General Relativity. Does the resulting repulsion and "falling up" violate the equivalence principle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This thread is closed. There are many previous threads here in which the possibility of negative gravitational mass is discussed.
 
The short summary: no, this is impossible in general relativity. Everything follows the same geodesics there, everything has to fall down to Earth for example.

Edit: Ah, Nugatory closed the thread already.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Doc Al

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
11K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
952