Theoretical question about forces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of forces in equilibrium, specifically regarding the sag in cables supporting city traffic lights. Participants emphasize that increasing tension in the cables can reduce sag but cannot eliminate it due to the constant force of gravity acting on the lights. A free-body diagram illustrating the forces involved is recommended for clarity. The conversation also critiques the mayor's decision to minimize cable use without understanding the engineering principles behind sag design.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of forces in equilibrium
  • Familiarity with free-body diagrams
  • Basic knowledge of tension and gravity
  • Concept of cable design and material properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of forces in equilibrium in physics
  • Study free-body diagram techniques for analyzing forces
  • Explore the relationship between cable tension, sag, and gravity
  • Investigate engineering design principles for cable systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and legal professionals involved in cases related to engineering practices and municipal regulations will benefit from this discussion.

mizzy
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The mayor of a city decides to fire some city employees because they will not remove the sag from cables that support the city traffic lights. If you were a lawyer and knew some physics, what defence would you give on behalf of the employees? Who do you think will win the case in court?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I'm thinking of the theory of Forces in equilibrium. Even if you remove the sag by increasing the tension in the cables, the light will always be motionless, but there's always the force of gravity pulling it down. Thus, the cables will still sag.

Does this make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mizzy said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm thinking of the theory of Forces in equilibrium. Even if you remove the sag by increasing the tension in the cables, the light will always be motionless, but there's always the force of gravity pulling it down. Thus, the cables will still sag.

Does this make sense?
It sounds like you have the right idea. You could also draw a free-body diagram for the traffic light, showing the forces from gravity and cable tension.
 
mizzy said:
Does this make sense?

It does make sense that the cable will still sag, but if you increase the tension, it will sag less. What will happen if the cable is pulled tighter and tighter, thus raising the light and shortening the cable? This problem is related to the classic physics problem where you show that it takes infinite tension to make the cable perfectly straight with no sag.

Now ask, "Why would an engineer design the sag into the system?".

It seems the Mayor wants to save money by using less cable, but he clearly does not understand physics and engineering. The engineer will design based on keeping the light at an acceptable height and minimizing the cable cost. How is cost of the cable related to it's length? How is the cable cost related to it's thickness?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
27K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K