Theory of Surfaces and Theory of Curves Relationship

In summary, the conversation is discussing the relationship between the Frenet-Serret Formulas and classical differential geometry, specifically in relation to surfaces and space curves. The conversation also touches on the concept of normal vectors and how they relate to gradients on surfaces. The suggestion is made to consult a book on classical differential geometry for more information.
  • #1
ltkach2015
37
1
Hello

I am interested in the Frenet-Serret Formulas (theory of curves?) relationship to theory of surfaces.

1) Can one arrive to the Frenet-Serret Formulas starting from the theory of surfaces? Any advice on where to begin?

2) For a surface that contain a space curve: if the unit tangent vector to the curve is the very same unit tangent vector the surface then why/how is the unit normal vector to the curve not in the same direction as the surface's gradient vector?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ltkach2015 said:
Hello

I am interested in the Frenet-Serret Formulas (theory of curves?) relationship to theory of surfaces.

1) Can one arrive to the Frenet-Serret Formulas starting from the theory of surfaces? Any advice on where to begin?

2) For a surface that contain a space curve: if the unit tangent vector to the curve is the very same unit tangent vector the surface then why/how is the unit normal vector to the curve not in the same direction as the surface's gradient vector?

Thank you
A basic book on classical differential geometry is Lectures on Classical Differential Geometry by Struik. Without a specific question it is difficult to give a specific reply.
 
  • #3
lavinia said:
A basic book on classical differential geometry is Lectures on Classical Differential Geometry by Struik. Without a specific question it is difficult to give a specific reply.

Ok

Why doesn't the normal to space curve contained on a surface not point in the same direction as that surfaces normal vector (gradient)?
 
  • #4
Think about latitude circles on a sphere.
 
  • #5
zinq said:
Think about latitude circles on a sphere.
Oh ok!

So the sphere's gradient vector would point in the same direction as the circle's negative normal vector?
 
  • #6
Hint: You can determine the circle's normal vector from the plane that it's in.
 

1. What is the difference between the Theory of Surfaces and the Theory of Curves?

The Theory of Surfaces and the Theory of Curves are both branches of mathematics that study shapes and their properties. The main difference between them is that the Theory of Surfaces focuses on two-dimensional shapes, while the Theory of Curves focuses on one-dimensional shapes.

2. How are the Theory of Surfaces and the Theory of Curves related?

The Theory of Surfaces and the Theory of Curves are closely related as they both deal with the study of geometric shapes. In fact, the Theory of Curves can be seen as a special case of the Theory of Surfaces, where the surface is flattened into a one-dimensional curve.

3. What are some real-world applications of the Theory of Surfaces and the Theory of Curves?

The Theory of Surfaces and the Theory of Curves have numerous applications in various fields, such as computer graphics, physics, engineering, and architecture. They are used to model and analyze the shapes of objects and surfaces in the physical world.

4. How do the concepts of curvature and geodesic play a role in the Theory of Surfaces and the Theory of Curves?

Curvature and geodesic are two important concepts in both the Theory of Surfaces and the Theory of Curves. Curvature measures the amount by which a curve or surface deviates from being straight, while geodesic refers to the shortest path between two points on a surface or curve. These concepts are essential in understanding the properties and behavior of shapes.

5. Can the Theory of Surfaces and the Theory of Curves be applied to non-Euclidean geometries?

Yes, the Theory of Surfaces and the Theory of Curves can be applied to non-Euclidean geometries, such as spherical and hyperbolic geometries. In these geometries, the concepts of curvature and geodesic take on different meanings, but the fundamental principles of the theories still hold true.

Similar threads

  • Differential Geometry
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
7
Views
207
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top