There are people in biology who really do math

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion highlights a special issue of the journal Genetics that features articles integrating mathematical concepts within biological research. It emphasizes the availability of open access articles, allowing readers to access content without financial barriers. Specific articles marked with an unlocked padlock icon are freely accessible, promoting wider dissemination of mathematical applications in biology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical modeling in biological contexts
  • Familiarity with open access publishing
  • Knowledge of genetics as a scientific discipline
  • Basic skills in navigating academic journals
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore mathematical modeling techniques in genetics
  • Research the impact of open access on scientific communication
  • Investigate specific articles from the Genetics journal's special issue
  • Learn about the role of statistics in biological research
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in biology, mathematicians applying their skills to biological problems, and academics interested in the intersection of math and genetics will benefit from this discussion.

BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,736
Reaction score
11,956
Here is some of a special issue of Genetics of articles using math:

Screenshot 2026-01-10 at 6.42.27 PM.webp


Many of the articles are open access. They can be seen here.
Those articles with the unlocked padlock can be read for free.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: javisot and pinball1970
Biology news on Phys.org
I'm pretty sure you're loathe to hear it, which I suspect is why I insist on it's postulation, but history and philosophy use math too. Unfortunately my math isn't as strong as yours so I'm hard pressed to find the good examples.

History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
James Clerk Maxwell on quantities and units


History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
"That Star Is Not on the Map": The German Side of the discovery

Neptune was telescopically discovered by Johan Gottfried Galle and Heinrich Louis d'Arrest in Berlin on 23 September 1846 based on the prediction by Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier. The role German astronomers played in the discovery has often been overshadowed by the controversies that erupted in England and France after the discovery. However, their role was crucial, not only in bringing about the discovery in the first place, but also in resolving some of the post-discovery controversies that erupted around priority for the prediction and naming of the planet. German astronomers in Central and Eastern Europe possessed some of the best telescopes of the day and had established themselves over several decades as being at the forefront of observational astronomy. They had produced the star charts that in the end proved indispensable for allowing identification of the planet, while a German publication, Astronomische Nachrichten, published by H. C. Schumacher in Altona, in the vicinity of Hamburg, then part of the Kingdom of Denmark, served as the journal of record. The general neglect of the German part of the story is most strongly attested by the inaccuracies concerning what actually happened on discovery night, which were long propagated in the English-speaking literature. Notably, for 30 years after the discovery, it was not appreciated that there were two observers, while the role of the sky map used was often exaggerated. This chapter sets forth a more complete picture, and in particular emphasises more than previous accounts the critical role of d'Arrest, arguing that he should be celebrated as a co-discoverer. In addition, evidence presented here, much of it not previously available in the English-speaking literature, shows that the name "Neptune" was eventually accepted throughout the scientific community based on German precedents.

History and Overview (math.HO); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
Mathematics in the liturgical books of the Catholic Church: phases of the ecclesiastical moon

We use contemporary mathematical notation to describe the method for determining the age of the ecclesiastical moon as mandated by pope Gregory XIII and elaborated in the book of Christopher Clavius \emph{Romani calendarii explicatio}. The algorithm is first introduced by using the tabular method employed by liturgical books such as the Roman Missal, Breviary and Martyrology. Then we construct the recurrence equation for the epacts, derive its solution, and give a simple expression for the age of the moon on a given day of the year. We also consider the problems which can occur at the transition from December 31 to January 1 of the next year, when there could be a ``jump'' in moon's age ("saltus lunae") in years when epact corrections are applied. We propose a simple solution which fixes these problems. A summary of the formulae and listing of the implementation of relevant functions in Python is provided in the last section.

:woot:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
207
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K