Therefore, (mn)! is divisible by m!(n!)^m.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rukawakaede
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divisibility Factorial
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that \( m! (n!)^m \) divides \( (mn)! \) for integers \( m \) and \( n \). Participants establish that \( (n!)^m \) divides \( (mn)! \) due to the equality \( n + \cdots + n = mn \). They also demonstrate that \( m!(nm-m)! \) divides \( (mn)! \). The key insight involves the multinomial coefficient \( \binom{nm}{n, \ldots, n} \) and its divisibility by \( m! \), with a focus on proving divisibility for prime factors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of factorial notation and properties
  • Familiarity with multinomial coefficients
  • Knowledge of binomial theorem and its applications
  • Basic concepts of modular arithmetic
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of multinomial coefficients in combinatorics
  • Learn about divisibility rules for factorials and binomial coefficients
  • Explore advanced topics in modular arithmetic and its applications in combinatorial proofs
  • Investigate the generalization of divisibility proofs for composite numbers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, combinatorial theorists, and students studying number theory or combinatorics who are interested in factorial properties and divisibility in combinatorial contexts.

rukawakaede
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hi, we know that for all interger m, n_1!\cdots n_k! divides m! where n_1+\cdots+n_k=m.

Now I want to show that m! (n!)^m divides (mn)!.

We see that (n!)^m divides (mn)! since \overbrace{n+\cdots+n}^{m-terms}=mn

Also m!(nm-m)! divides (mn)! similarly.

But how could I show my required statement above? It works for some examples that I've tested and I believe it is true.

Any inputs would be appreciated! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi rukawakaede! :smile:

First of all, let us define the multinomial coefficient: (for k_1+...+k_m=1)

\binom{n}{k_1,...,k_m}=\frac{n!}{k_1!...k_m!}

What you want to show is that the multinomial coefficient

\binom{nm}{n,...,n}

is divisible by m!

Now, first note the following equality that represents the multinomial coefficients as binomials:

\binom{nm}{n,...,n}=\binom{n}{n} \binom{2n}{n}\binom{3n}{n} ...\binom{mn}{n}

So it actually suffices to show that \binom{kn}{n} is divisible by k.

Let me give the idea on how to prove this by showing that 2 divides \binom{2n}{n}.

Factorize 2n=2^rs such that 2 does not divide s. In modulo 2, we know that

(X+1)^2=X^2+1

and thus

(X+1)^{2^r}=X^{2^r}+1

and thus

(X+1)^{2n}=(X^{2^r}+1)^s

Expanding both terms using the binomial theorem gives us that the coefficient of X^n in both terms are equal. But the coefficient of X^n in the left polynomial is

\binom{2n}{n}

But the coefficient of X^n in the right polynomial is 0, as we can never write n=2^rk (we have a 2 too much).

Hope that helped.
 
I'm wondering how you would generalize this method to composite m. The identity (1 + x)^{m} \equiv 1 + x^m doesn't hold for composite bases.
 
Yuqing said:
I'm wondering how you would generalize this method to composite m. The identity (1 + x)^{m} \equiv 1 + x^m doesn't hold for composite bases.

Prove it for all the prime factors. For example, to show that something is divisible by 6 is equivalent to showing that it is divisible by 2 and 3.
 
micromass said:
Prove it for all the prime factors. For example, to show that something is divisible by 6 is equivalent to showing that it is divisible by 2 and 3.

The problem I'm having is with prime powers. For example, your method proves 2 divides \binom{2n}{n}. Can you give an example on how you would prove, say, \binom{8n}{n}?
 
Hmm, I see the problem. But I made it harder than it was. In general, we know that

\binom{n}{k}=\frac{n}{k}\binom{n-1}{k-1}

Thus

\binom{\alpha n}{n}=\alpha\binom{\alpha n-1}{n-1}

so it is divisible by \alpha.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K