Thermal expansion coefficient of Jupiter

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the thermal expansion coefficient of Jupiter, focusing on the challenges of defining a singular coefficient due to the planet's heterogeneous composition. Participants explore the implications of this complexity and the potential for estimating an average value based on known constituents.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express difficulty in finding information on Jupiter's thermal expansion coefficient.
  • One participant suggests starting with the average composition of Jupiter's atmosphere as a basis for understanding the thermal expansion coefficient.
  • Another participant argues that due to Jupiter's non-homogeneous constitution, a singular thermal expansion coefficient is meaningless.
  • Some propose that a proportionally sound average of all known constituents could provide a somewhat informative estimation.
  • Others counter that considering the variety of high-pressure phases and numerous unknowns, such an estimation may not be feasible.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the feasibility of estimating a thermal expansion coefficient for Jupiter, with multiple competing views on the significance of its heterogeneous composition.

darknessvirtu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Does anybody know? I tried googling can't seem to turn up any answers
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Uh, you might start by googling for the average composition of Jupiter's atmosphere to the depth that the Galileo mission's probe survived...
 
darknessvirtu said:
Does anybody know? I tried googling can't seem to turn up any answers

Jupiter doesn't have a homogeneous constitution so a singular coefficient is meaningless.
 
Jupiter doesn't have a homogeneous constitution so a singular coefficient is meaningless.

Surely a proportionally sound average of all known constituents would yield a somewhat informative estimation.
 
Jimbone said:
Surely a proportionally sound average of all known constituents would yield a somewhat informative estimation.

Considering the variety of high pressure phases and multitude of unknowns involved, no.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K