Thermodynamics - efficiency question

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the efficiency of a car engine using gasoline as fuel. The car burns gasoline at a rate of approximately 30,000 kcal per gallon and averages 41 km per gallon while requiring 25 horsepower. Initial calculations yield an efficiency of about 23.46%, but further analysis suggests a corrected efficiency of 24.4%. Participants emphasize the importance of accurate unit conversions and avoiding premature rounding in calculations. The conversation highlights the significance of algebraic representation in understanding thermodynamic efficiency.
N_L_
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
The burning of gasoline in a car releases about 3.0 x 10^4 kcal/gal. If a car averages 41 km/gal when driving 90 km/h, which requires 25 hp, what is the efficiency of the engine under those conditions?

I think I have an answer, but I'm not sure if it's correct.

1 horsepower = 746 watts

25 hp = 18650 watts

1 kcal = 4186 joules (watts / sec)

e = W / Qh = 1 - (Ql / Qh)

1 gal / 41 km at 91 km / h means that that 2.26 gallons will be used in one hour.

Since no temperatues are given I don't think that the 1 - Ql / Qh is needed...

Converting 30000 kcal / gal to watts I get 34883 joules/sec. Since 2.26 gal are used, I multiplied the above by 2.26 to get 78836.

Dividing 18650 watts (from hp) by 78836 I got an efficiency of 23.46%.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
N_L_ said:
The burning of gasoline in a car releases about 3.0 x 10^4 kcal/gal. If a car averages 41 km/gal when driving 90 km/h, which requires 25 hp, what is the efficiency of the engine under those conditions?

I think I have an answer, but I'm not sure if it's correct.

1 horsepower = 746 watts

25 hp = 18650 watts

1 kcal = 4186 joules (watts / sec)

e = W / Qh = 1 - (Ql / Qh)

1 gal / 41 km at 91 km / h means that that 2.26 gallons will be used in one hour.

Since no temperatues are given I don't think that the 1 - Ql / Qh is needed...

Converting 30000 kcal / gal to watts I get 34883 joules/sec. Since 2.26 gal are used, I multiplied the above by 2.26 to get 78836.

Dividing 18650 watts (from hp) by 78836 I got an efficiency of 23.46%.
You don't need to find Qc but it is just:Qc = Qh - W. You don't need temperatures to find this.

You should state your answer algebraically so you and others can follow the physical reasoning. ie:

\eta = W/Q_h = (dW/dt)/(dQ_h/dt)

Your answer is almost right. I get 2.195 gal/hr (90/41) not 2.26.

dQ_h/dt = 2.195 * gal/hr = 3 x 10^4 * 2.195 * 4.186 KJ/hr = 2.76 x 10^8 J/hr = 7.66 x 10^4 J/sec

dW/dt = Power = 25 * 746 J/sec = 1.87 x 10^4 J/sec

So:

\eta = 1.87/7.66 = 24.4%

AM
 
Last edited:
I have not rigorously checked your answer, however the efficency appears reasonable for a car, just beware of rounding too early in your calculations, this could induce significant errors. For example you obtained 78836 watts for the input power of the engine, however I obtained 78798\frac{2}{3}.

Just a small point that I sould point out is that here you said;
N_L_ said:
1 kcal = 4186 joules (watts / sec)
I'm sure this is just a typo, but this should be joules = watts * sec. Power is work done (energy) divided by time, therefore it follows that energy is the product of power and time.

~H

Sorry AM, didn't see your post. I sould learn to type faster :wink:
 
Thank you.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 113 ·
4
Replies
113
Views
19K
Replies
1
Views
6K