Thin film light interference question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the thickness of an oil film (n=1.31) floating on water, given the maximum reflection at 450nm and minimum at 600nm. The relevant equations for thin film interference are 2t = (m + 1/2) λ / n for destructive interference and 2t = m * (λ / n) for constructive interference. The user must consider the phase shift due to reflection at the higher index of refraction, as the oil film is sandwiched between air and water (n=1.33). Proper application of these equations is crucial for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thin film interference principles
  • Familiarity with the index of refraction (n) and its implications
  • Knowledge of constructive and destructive interference equations
  • Basic physics concepts related to light behavior in different media
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of thin film interference equations
  • Learn about phase shifts in reflection at boundaries with different refractive indices
  • Explore practical applications of thin film interference in optical devices
  • Investigate the effects of varying film thickness on light interference patterns
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of light interference in thin films.

ia22
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A uniform film of oil (n=1.31) is floating on water. When sunlight in air is incident normally on the film, an observer finds that the reflected light has a maximum at wavelength (lambda) = 450nm and a minimum at wavelength (lambda) = 600nm. What is the thickness of the oil film?

Homework Equations



The light equations for constructive and destructive interference. 2t = (m + 1/2) lambda / n and 2t = m * (lambda / n)

The Attempt at a Solution



I am having difficulties knowing where to start. We haven't had a question like this before.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

You may need to be careful with the application of those equations. Under what scenario were they derived? a thin-film suspended in air?

Here's why: Let n2 be the index of refraction of the thin-film and let n1 and n3 be the indexes for other media, which may or may not be the same. Now suppose that the equations that you have quoted were derived for a thin-film suspended in air. Then n2 > n1 and n2 > n3. Now compare this with your scenario in the problem, where n1 is the air, n2 is the thin-film of oil, and n3 is water. According to my physics text, the index of refraction of water is 1.33. Thus, for this scenario, n2 > n1 and n3 > n2 and the scenarios are not equivalent. Recall that reflection off a higher-index results in a phase shift of 0.5 wavelength.

You may need to derive the equations yourself. My hunch is that you just need to reverse the equations, but I'll let you verify that on your own. Just let me know if you need further assistance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
8K