Think You Know about the LHC? - Comments

  • Context: Insights 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lhc
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion revolves around a quiz related to the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), with participants sharing their scores and insights. Several users noted that the first papers on the LHC were based on data obtained at 900 GeV, and many relied on resources from the CERN website and the LHC wiki for their answers. Scores varied widely, with some participants achieving as low as 3 out of 13 and others reaching 11 out of 13. The conversation highlights the varying levels of knowledge about the LHC among participants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics concepts
  • Familiarity with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
  • Knowledge of CERN's research outputs
  • Basic grasp of high-energy physics terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the significance of the 900 GeV data in LHC studies
  • Explore the history and construction timeline of the LHC
  • Learn about the various experiments conducted at the LHC
  • Investigate the role of the CERN website as a resource for particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Anyone interested in particle physics, educators teaching science, and individuals preparing for quizzes or discussions about the Large Hadron Collider and its findings.

Messages
19,865
Reaction score
10,851
Greg Bernhardt submitted a new PF Insights post

Think You Know about the LHC?

LHCquiz-80x80.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
11/13, but several somewhat lucky guesses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
PAllen said:
11/13, but several somewhat lucky guesses.
Nice work! Some of the numbers can be tricky.
 
I don't think I agree with #2 - the first papers were based on data obtained at 900 GeV.
 
5/13
Failed..:oldfrown:
 
5/13

I had no clue on any quetion and guessed every single one, so that says something about multiple choice tests.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
I don't think I agree with #2 - the first papers were based on data obtained at 900 GeV.
I got most material from the CERN website or the LHC wiki entry.
 
7/13 yikes.
 
  • #10
Greg Bernhardt said:
I got most material from the CERN website or the LHC wiki entry.

Nevertheless, the first papers were based on data obtained at 900 GeV.
 
  • #11
I decided not to take the test when I saw the first question and I realized it was a good decision when I continued reading other questions!
 
  • #12
3/13
 
  • #13
11/13 -- I guess I didn't too badly at all! :)
 
  • #14
StatGuy2000 said:
11/13 -- I guess I didn't too badly at all! :)
That is fully loaded, your brain should contain a large volume of LHC knowledge.
 
  • #15
Silicon Waffle said:
That is fully loaded, your brain should contain a large volume of LHC knowledge.

Not particularly -- it's just I seem to have a pretty good recall of what I've read about the LHC recently.
 
  • #16
6/13, mostly guessing. I divided 300,000 by 27 to get 11,000 times a second (close to light speed) and of course the picture looks like a "compact" muon solenoid...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silicon Waffle
  • #17
5/13
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silicon Waffle
  • #18
Construction started in 1998? But LEP was still down there :/
 
  • #19
You are right - the tunnel was started much earlier. That's another bad question. However, it is possible to start building magnets before the LEP tunnel was emptied.
 
  • #20
6, (At least I was mostly right about some technical aspects of the various experiments and what they are.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silicon Waffle
  • #21
my score is 8 out of 13
 
  • #22
8 of 13, did I beat MFB?
 
  • #24
8/13 is too many to me.:wideeyed:
 
  • #25
mfb said:
Nice try ;)
Fortunately, I read a lot of your posts or it would have been 3 out of 13!
 
  • #26
6/13 Just passed! Phew! :oldtongue:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silicon Waffle
  • #27
6/13
 

Similar threads

  • Sticky
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
9K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K