Thoughts on a second degree in Electronic Engineering

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decision to pursue a second degree in Electronic Engineering (EE) after completing a degree in Applied Physics with an emphasis on electronics. The original poster is weighing the benefits of obtaining the EE degree against entering the job market with a physics degree. Participants share insights on the importance of job prospects, with one individual noting that their decision to pursue EE was financially motivated, leading to dissatisfaction. The consensus suggests that while an EE degree may enhance employability, personal interest and job satisfaction should also be prioritized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Applied Physics principles
  • Familiarity with Electronic Engineering concepts
  • Knowledge of job market trends in engineering and physics
  • Awareness of professional certification requirements in Canada
NEXT STEPS
  • Research job market demands for Electronic Engineering graduates in Canada
  • Explore the curriculum and career outcomes of Electronic Engineering programs
  • Investigate professional certification options for engineers and technologists
  • Evaluate personal interests and career goals in relation to physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, career advisors, and professionals considering further education in engineering or physics.

Carlos_Monty
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am in the process of wrapping up my degree in Applied Physics with emphasis in electronics. The program has required me to take several courses from the electronic engineering department, which I have thoroughly enjoyed. I have done some planning, and it will take me one extra year to complete a degree in Electronic Engineering once I am finished in physics.

I am seeking opinions on whether or not to go for the engineering degree or, just settle with the physics. To me, it seems like a small investment of my time to get the engineering degree, but I am also eager to just find a job and get some experience. I'm not sure if it will prove beneficial, or if it would just be redundant to get the engineering designation. This post is aimed at those who have some industry experience in engineering and physics, not speculators. Let me know what you think. Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I went for an EE masters directly after my physics BS. I didn't like it, personally. Engineers are interested in different questions using the same material. I feel somehow at my school, the physics teachers were a lot better too.

One of the large problems was that my decision was based on money, not interest. Bad decision.

Anyway, I ended up designing my own degree in computational neuroscience instead.

Still not sure what route I'll I for PhD. Maybe more biology, maybe more compute science.
 
Pythagorean said:
One of the large problems was that my decision was based on money, not interest. Bad decision.

Hi Pythagorean. When you say that your decision was motivated by money, do you mean that you pursued EE to make yourself more employable? If so, did you find that your job landscape was broadened with the EE designation?

Based on the 10 EE courses I've taken, I already know that I like it. I am less concerened about the content and more about the job prospects I will have. When I look around at Canadian job postings, it seems everyone wants engineers and technologists with professional certification. I worry that a professional physicist will be overlooked in many instances.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K