Three-Particle Quantum Nonlocality under Strict Locality Conditions

Click For Summary
A new paper has been released detailing an experiment that successfully tests three-particle quantum nonlocality while closing both the locality and freedom-of-choice loopholes. This research builds on previous work involving Bell tests and extends the investigation to Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states, utilizing a complex setup with optical fiber and free-space links. The experiment achieved a Mermin parameter of 2.77, significantly exceeding the inequality bound, indicating a strong violation of local realism. The findings advance the understanding of quantum mechanics and have implications for multi-party quantum communication protocols. The detailed methodology and results contribute to ongoing discussions about the foundations of quantum science.
DrChinese
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
8,498
Reaction score
2,130
Just posted to the archives is a great new paper from a top experimental team. These are some of the same individuals that performed the now standard citation regarding a Bell test under strict locality conditions. They have now extended their concept to GHZ states, and also close the Detection loophole while they are at it.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.1379

Experimental Three-Particle Quantum Nonlocality under Strict Locality Conditions

C. Erven, E. Meyer-Scott, K. Fisher, J. Lavoie, B. L. Higgins, Z. Yan, C. J. Pugh, J.-P. Bourgoin, R. Prevedel, L. K. Shalm, L. Richards, N. Gigov, R. Laflamme, G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, K. J. Resch
(Submitted on 5 Sep 2013)

"Quantum correlations are critical to our understanding of nature, with far-reaching technological and fundamental impact. These often manifest as violations of Bell's inequalities, bounds derived from the assumptions of locality and realism, concepts integral to classical physics. Many tests of Bell's inequalities have studied pairs of correlated particles; however, the immense interest in multi-particle quantum correlations is driving the experimental frontier to test systems beyond just pairs. All experimental violations of Bell's inequalities to date require supplementary assumptions, opening the results to one or more loopholes, the closing of which is one of the most important challenges in quantum science. Individual loopholes have been closed in experiments with pairs of particles and a very recent result closed the detection loophole in a six ion experiment. No experiment thus far has closed the locality loopholes with three or more particles. Here, we distribute three-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entangled states using optical fibre and free-space links to independent measurement stations. The measured correlations constitute a test of Mermin's inequality while closing both the locality and related freedom-of-choice loopholes due to our experimental configuration and timing. We measured a Mermin parameter of 2.77 +/- 0.08, violating the inequality bound of 2 by over 9 standard deviations, with minimum tolerances for the locality and freedom-of-choice loopholes of 264 +/- 28 ns and 304 +/- 25 ns, respectively. These results represent a significant advance towards definitive tests of the foundations of quantum mechanics and practical multi-party quantum communications protocols."

The write up features some tremendous detail on the setup, which is quite complex. Nice diagrams too. They "report the experimental violation of the three-particle Mermin’s inequality closing both the locality and freedom-of-choice loopholes, having to make only the fair-sampling assumption." GHZ experiments are interesting because each individual trial is expected to yield a result in conflict with local realistic descriptions. Bell tests, by contrast, show this conflict only as a statistical difference over a large number of trials.

Enjoy!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think they only close the locality and freedom of choice loopholes. They make reference to another experiment that closed the detection loophole, using ions.
 
How did they close the freedom of choice loophole? Isn't superdetermnism unfalsifiable?
 
StevieTNZ said:
I think they only close the locality and freedom of choice loopholes. They make reference to another experiment that closed the detection loophole, using ions.

fully concur.


.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
12K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K