Three principal axis moments of inertia for hexagonal prism?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the mass moments of inertia for a hexagonal prism with a longitudinal z-axis. The user, John, attempts to derive the moments using both equilateral triangles and rectangles but encounters difficulties in applying the correct differential elements in the inertia formula. Key insights include the importance of dividing the prism into simpler shapes with known moments of inertia and utilizing the parallel and perpendicular axis theorems. The correct formulation for the moment of inertia involves integrating the mass element over the defined volume.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mass moments of inertia
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically triple integrals
  • Knowledge of parallel and perpendicular axis theorems
  • Basic geometry of hexagonal prisms and equilateral triangles
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to apply the parallel and perpendicular axis theorems in moment of inertia calculations
  • Study the derivation of moments of inertia for composite shapes
  • Explore the use of triple integrals in calculating volume and mass properties
  • Review examples of mass moment calculations for hexagonal and other polygonal prisms
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering courses, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as professionals involved in structural analysis and material science who require a solid understanding of mass moments of inertia for complex shapes.

John Darvish
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I'm trying to figure out the mass moments of inertia for a hexagonal prism, with the z-axis being longitudinal. I'm trying to recall my calc 3 from 2 years ago and am failing miserably.

I know the height of the prism is h. Each hexagonal side is length a. The prism has constant density ρ. I can easily find the area and volume via relationships with equilateral triangles.

With the above dimensions and constants

ρ = m/V
m = ρ*V = 3*√3 /2 *ρ*a2*h

I initially tried to find the 3 moments of inertia just using a combination of 6 equilateral triangles. My second attempt divided up the hexagon into rectangles and then the remaining triangles. I didn't get the results I had seen via internet searches, though some of the internet searches had different results for the moments of inertia so they may have been in error.

I'm not exactly sure what I am doing right or wrong. I think my errors are in defining the dx, dy, and dz differentials when I am trying to relate dm from the general inertia formula.

∫r2 dm

I'd appreciate any help you can provide.

Thanks

John
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wiki has a list of moments of inertia. The plane polygon one can give you the prism's moment around the longitudinal axis. The rod one can give you a reasonable approximation to the other two. The rod in wiki is cylindrical. If you want to get an exact answer for the prism for the two non-longitudinal axes, I suggest you first post your attempts along those lines, and people can point out where/if it has gone wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Simon Bridge
Dividing the shape into simpler bits is what you are doing right.
Trouble is that you don't seem to know what to do with the simple bits... and, since you are so uncertain, you have not been brave enough to detail what you tried here. It is difficult to help you if we don't know how you were using the equilateral triangles etc.
Remember that you are dividing up a volume... and triangles do not have a volume. So what did you do?

The trick is to divide into bits that you already know the moment of inertia for, and use the parallel and perpendicular axis theorems. Is that what you tried? Or did you just get stuck after sketching out the shapes?

The calc approach is to realize that the moment of inertia about (say) the z axis, of the mass element dm at position (x,y,z) is
$$dL = \rho(x^2+y^2)dxdydz$$
... for uniform density object.
 
Thanks folks for replies. I'll take a photo of some of the work I've done later tonight, hopefully, to show the beginnings of putting the triple integral together for one of the axes. I think my most promising approach is dividing the hexagon into a rectangle and triangle and then going from there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Simon Bridge

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
52
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K