Three questions on injective functions.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter robbins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Injective
robbins
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Q1. Claim: Suppose f : Rn -> Rm is injective. Then m >= n. Is this true?

Q2. Claim: Suppose f : Rn -> Rn is injective and f(X) = [f1(X) f2(X) ... fn(X)]T. Then each fk must be injective. Is this true?

Q3. I assume the above claims are known results or have known counterexamples. Can someone direct me to a good text or reference for questions such as these?

Thanks.
 
on Phys.org
Space-filling curves should address #1.
 
A space-filling curve is everywhere self-intersecting, and therefore can't be injective (though they are surjective). However, your point is taken: by Cantor's theorem the cardinality of [0, 1] is the same as [0, 1]^n for any finite n. And a mapping f : A -> B where |A| = |B| can be injective.
 
robbins said:
Q1. Claim: Suppose f : Rn -> Rm is injective. Then m >= n. Is this true?

All Rn's (n>0) have the same http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality" , hence there exist bijective maps between them.

Q2. Claim: Suppose f : Rn -> Rn is injective and f(X) = [f1(X) f2(X) ... fn(X)]T. Then each fk must be injective. Is this true?

Not sure if I understand you correctly. The identity map on R^2 is injective, but the components are the coordinate projections, which are not injective.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
robbins said:
A space-filling curve is everywhere self-intersecting, and therefore can't be injective (though they are surjective). However, your point is taken: by Cantor's theorem the cardinality of [0, 1] is the same as [0, 1]^n for any finite n. And a mapping f : A -> B where |A| = |B| can be injective.

Right, sorry. I knew that they were all the same size, and I knew about space-filling curves, but I didn't check that they actually worked for the problem stated!
 
yyat said:
All Rn's (n>0) have the same http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality" , hence there exist bijective maps between them.



Not sure if I understand you correctly. The identity map on R^2 is injective, but the components are the coordinate projections, which are not injective.

I think he means that if the infective mapping can be written in a form where the mapping for each component only depend on the value of that component, the mapping for each component is injective.

For such a statement the hypothesis is is difficult to satisfy because it almost looks like a one dimensional curve in an n dimensional space.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
John Creighto said:
I think he means that if the infective mapping can be written in a form where the mapping for each component only depend on the value of that component, the mapping for each component is injective.

For such a statement the hypothesis is is difficult to satisfy because it almost looks like a one dimensional curve in an n dimensional space.

Your interpretation is correct. My original question was not stated clearly (should have used subscripts).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K