Three spheres attached by conducting wire

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total charge Q of a system of three conducting spheres connected by thin wires, given the electric field E_a at the surface of the sphere with radius a. Gauss's Law is applied to determine the charge on sphere A, leading to the equation q_a = 4πa²ε₀E_a. The relationship between the charge of one sphere and the total charge is questioned, with a proposed formula Q = (aE_a/k_e)(a+b+c). For the work done in bringing a small charge q to sphere b, the potential energy difference is calculated, resulting in the expression k_e(qQ)/(a+b+c). The assumption that the influence of spheres a and c on charge q's potential is negligible is discussed, emphasizing that all spheres share the same potential due to their conductive connection.
valarking
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

Three conducting spheres of radii a, b and c, respectively, are connected by negligibly
thin conducting wires as shown in figure 4. Distances between spheres are much larger
than their sizes. The electric field on the surface of the sphere of radius a is measured to
be equal to E_a. What is the total charge Q that this system of three spheres holds? How
much work do we have to do to bring a very small charge q from infinity to the sphere of
radius b?

http://www.vkgfx.com/physics/fig4.jpg

The attempt at a solution

This one I wasn't so sure about. In order to find the total charge, I first applied Gauss's Law to find the charge of one sphere, A, given the electric field on its surface. So \oint {\vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A}} = \frac{Q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_0} is used to get:
4\pi{a^2}E_a = \frac{q_a}{\epsilon_0}, or q_a = 4\pi{a^2}\epsilon_0{E_a}.

To get the relationship between one sphere and the total charge in a system of conducting connected spheres, I used this equation, which I'm not so sure about.
q_A = \frac{Qa}{a+b+c}
I'm not sure if the radii should be squared.

Solving for Q gives:
Q = \frac{{a}E_a}{k_e}(a+b+c)

Now for the second part, again I wasn't sure of this. But you could say the work going from infinitely far to right at sphere B would be the difference in potential energies.
So:
k_e\frac{q{q_b}}{b} - k_e\frac{q{q_b}}{\infty}
where the infinity cancels out the second fraction and leaves:
k_e\frac{q{q_b}}{b}
as the answer.
Plugging in b's charge gives:
\frac{k_e{q}{Q}}{a+b+c}

I believe that any effect a or c would have on charge q's potential would be small enough not to matter. I am correct in this assumption?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The spheres are connected by conductors - so they have the same potential.
Figure out the potential on sphere a, then use that to find the charges on the others.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
642
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K