TI-89 Titanium or TI-Nspire CX CAS?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the choice between the TI-89 Titanium and the TI-Nspire CX CAS graphing calculators for high school and college use, particularly in the context of advanced mathematics and engineering courses. Participants explore the pros and cons of each calculator, considering factors such as ease of use, features, and personal preferences.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses the need for a reliable calculator for high school and college, specifically for advanced math and engineering courses, and seeks advice on whether to choose the TI-89T or the TI-Nspire CX CAS.
  • Some participants mention that the Nspire CX CAS is perceived as harder to use compared to the TI-89T, raising questions about usability as a deciding factor.
  • Another participant suggests that staying within the same line of technology (TI) may be beneficial for ease of use, implying that familiarity with the TI-84 could favor the TI-89T.
  • It is noted that both calculators have similar capabilities, including CAS and 3D graphing, but differ in operating systems and layout, with the Nspire featuring a colored screen and higher resolution.
  • Concerns are raised about the Nspire's programming capabilities compared to the TI-89T, though the accuracy of this claim is uncertain.
  • A participant shares their positive experience with the Nspire CX CAS, highlighting its user-friendly menu system and ease of navigation despite a learning curve for graphing features.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express mixed feelings about the calculators, with no consensus reached on which is definitively better. Some favor the TI-89T for its familiarity, while others advocate for the Nspire CX CAS due to its advanced features, indicating an unresolved debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference usability, personal experience, and feature comparisons without resolving the differences in user experience or preferences. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions about the calculators' capabilities and user interfaces.

l2udolph
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi.

So, for the first time my younger sibling will need a graphing calculator for their classes so I'm giving them my TI-84 Plus and getting myself a new, better one. Right now I'm a Junior in high school taking ap-chemistry, ap-physics and ap-calculus AB. Next year I'll be taking calc BC (my school has AB as a prerequisite to BC).

I'm looking for a calculator that will last me through high school and college, maybe longer. So far that turns out to be the ti-89T and the ti-nspire cx cas. I read on the HP 50G but I won't feel comfortable trying to use it's RPN input method when I'm the only one in my classes (and school) using it.

When in college I plan on taking the highest level math courses available (I love math, lol) and majoring in engineering (probably computer engineering and electrical). So, which calculator should I get?

I understand that some people will say that these calculators are bad because I will rely on them to do the work for me rather than understanding the concept myself, but I will not be using them for this purpose. I will be using them to mainly check if my work is correct or not after I have finished it, and stuff like that.

So, which one and why?

Thanks!

EDIT:
I've read several forums on this same topic but none of them have actually told me why I should choose one over the other. They all have mixed feelings, so I don't know which to choose. What are the pros and cons of both?
 
Last edited:
Computer science news on Phys.org
l2udolph said:
I've heard from a lot of people that the Nspire CX CAS is harder to use, though. :l
Is that the only reason to choose it over TI-89T?

For general ease of use it's worthwhile to stay with the same line of technology. So if you are used to TI, continue with TI. You can't go wrong with either.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
For general ease of use it's worthwhile to stay with the same line of technology. So if you are used to TI, continue with TI. You can't go wrong with either.

Both calculators are made from TI.
Do you mean I should go with the TI-89T because it is what is closest to the TI-84 in comparison to the Nspire CX CAS?

Both calculators have CAS, 3D-graphing, and can basically do everything the other can. The only difference I see is that the Nspire has a radically different OS and layout, with a colored screen with higher resolution. But I hear so many people say it's the best and I should get it (and others say I shouldn't). But no one has explained why (thoroughly) to me.

I do know the other benefits such as copy/paste and documents etc, but I can't really see those helping me. I heard that the Nspire CX CAS is more conserved in letting you program on it than the TI-89T (although this might not be true).
 
Last edited:
If you've used the earlier line of 83/84 then get the 89T, otherwise start fresh with the Nspire.
 
My 83+ screen started going bad, and I have been using that calculator since '97. I replaced it with the nspire CX CAS and haven't looked back. It's easy enough to use once you get used to it. A lot of functions are in menus, but the menus are very easy to navigate, allowing use of the touchpad pointer, keyboard hotkeys, or directional pad (built into the touchpad). The menu system also means you don't have to remember any funky calculator syntax. The hardest thing to get used to, however, is the graphing. The capabilities are very robust, but the layout of its graphing features is vastly different from the lower 8x series calculators I've used. It will take some getting used to, but it's worth it and, ultimately, quite user-friendly.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
30K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
29K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K