TI89 calculator solver in functions?

Click For Summary
The TI89 Titanium's built-in solver can be utilized for compressible flow problems, specifically for calculating the Mach number based on area ratios. The "solve(" function returns text, which is not useful for further manipulation of values. Instead, the "nSolve(" function is recommended, as it can find numerical solutions. However, it only returns the first value that satisfies the equation. To refine the results, users can restrict the solution domain by using conditions in the "nSolve" function, allowing for targeted calculations for subsonic or supersonic flow. For subsonic flow, the syntax would be "nSolve(A/A* function, variable) | variable < 1," while for supersonic flow, it would be "... | variable > 1." This approach enables effective use of the calculator for specific flow conditions.
jzmaster
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
I was wondering if it's possible to use the TI89 Titanium's built-in solver with programs. More specifically, for compressible flow problems, I'd like to calculate mach number based on area ratio, specify whether the flow is subsonic or supersonic, then do something with the corresponding value.

Sadly, the "solve(" function returns text which is useless for manipulating the value (for example, taking the minimum)

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I solved this problem myself. Here's what I did:
the "solve(" function returns text no matter what you do. The only useful function is "nSolve(". Unfortunately, nSolve will give whatever value it finds first which satisfies the equation, and doesn't search for other values. It is still useable in this case though:
by using "nSolve(function,variable) | variable < value", I can restrict nSolve's solution to a specific domain. By doing so, I can get the value in the region I'm interested in (in this case, subsonic flow, I'd type "nSolve(A/A* function,variable) | variable < 1" for subsonic, or "... | variable > 1" for supersonic.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K