Tight Binding Hamiltonian and Potential (U)

Click For Summary
In specifying a tight binding Hamiltonian for a 3D solid, potential values (U) can be directly incorporated without transformation, as the potential function adheres to the superposition principle. The tight binding Hamiltonian is an empirical model designed to accurately reflect the energies of the lowest eigenstates, while also accounting for contributions from excited atomic states. However, there is no direct one-to-one correspondence between the potentials in the full Hamiltonian and those used in the tight binding approximation. This flexibility allows for the straightforward application of potential profiles along the x-direction. Understanding these nuances is crucial for effective modeling in condensed matter physics.
Arya_
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

Greetings !

Here is what I wish to know. Specifying a tight binding hamiltonian requires values of potential (U). Consider a 3d solid. If I have potential profile in x direction (U1, U2, U3...so on) can I directly plug in these U values into the tight binding hamiltonian or do I need to do some transformation (like change of space etc) before I can plug in 'potential values vs X' into Hamiltonian.

Thanks,
-Arya
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes,I think you can directly plug in these V(x) values into the tight binding hamiltonian.Because potential function meets the superposition principle.
 
The tight binding hamiltonian is an empirical effective hamiltonian which is parametrized in such a way as to give correct energies for the lowest eigenstates of the hamiltonian. Excited atomic states also make a contribution, also to the potential. So there is no 1 to 1 correspondence between some potential in the full hamiltonian and the U's appearing in the tight binding approximation.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K