Tight binding in cubic crystals

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the tight binding method in the context of band structure calculations for cubic crystals. Participants explore mathematical integrals related to the method, particularly focusing on the implications of cubic symmetry on certain parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a problem involving integrals related to the tight binding method and questions the equality of certain parameters, specifically \(\beta_{xx}\), \(\beta_{yy}\), and \(\beta_{zz}\).
  • Another participant asserts that \(\beta_{xy} = 0\) is due to the orthonormality of atomic orbitals, explaining that the integrand contains an odd function multiplied by an even function, leading to a zero integral.
  • Further discussion emphasizes the significance of cubic symmetry and its implications for the integrals \(\beta_{xx}\) and \(\beta_{yy}\), suggesting a relationship between the coordinates under rotation.
  • A participant notes that rotating the coordinate system should reveal that \(\beta_{xx}\) transforms into \(\beta_{yy}\), reinforcing the symmetry argument.
  • Another participant expresses clarity after the discussion but raises a new question about whether \(\gamma_{ij}(R)\) must be diagonal for simple cubic crystals, referencing calculations in an attached document.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the implications of orthonormality for \(\beta_{xy}\) and the role of cubic symmetry in the integrals. However, the discussion remains unresolved regarding the diagonal nature of \(\gamma_{ij}(R)\) in simple cubic crystals, as further clarification is sought.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the mathematical steps related to the diagonal nature of \(\gamma_{ij}(R)\) and its dependence on the symmetry of the crystal structure.

torehan
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
\phiHi all,

I would like to make band structure calculations with tight binding method and I start reading about this method from Ashcroft - Mermin, Chapter 10: The Tight Binding Method and try to solve the problems at the and of the chapter.

In problem 2
a. As a consequence of cubic symmetry, show that

\gamma_{ij}(R)=- \int d\vec{r} \psi^{*}_{i}(\vec{r})\psi_{j}(\vec{r}-\vec{R}) \Delta U(\vec{r})
\beta_{ij}= \gamma_{ij}(R=0)


\beta_{xx}= \beta_{yy}=\beta_{zz}=\beta_

and \beta_{xy}=0

So to calculate the \beta_{xx} ;

\beta_{xx}= - \int d\vec{r} \psi^{*}_{x}(\vec{r})\psi_{x}(\vec{r}) \Delta U(\vec{r})= - \int d\vec{r} x^{2} \left| \phi \right|^{2} \Delta U(\vec{r})

\beta_{yy}= - \int d\vec{r} \psi^{*}_{y}(\vec{r})\psi_{y}(\vec{r}) \Delta U(\vec{r})= - \int d\vec{r} y^{2} \left| \phi \right|^{2} \Delta U(\vec{r})

\beta_{zz}= - \int d\vec{r} \psi^{*}_{z}(\vec{r})\psi_{z}(\vec{r}) \Delta U(\vec{r})= - \int d\vec{r} z^{2} \left| \phi \right|^{2} \Delta U(\vec{r})


These must be equal to but I couldn't see any equalities as all of the integrals has difference in their integrands as x2 , y2 and z2.
And also \beta_{xy} must be zero as a concequence of cubic symmetry.

\beta_{xy}= - \int d\vec{r} \psi^{*}_{x}(\vec{r})\psi_{y}(\vec{r}) \Delta U(\vec{r})= - \int d\vec{r} xy \left| \phi \right|^{2} \Delta U(\vec{r})
Is it a concequence of orthanormality of atomic orbitals or what?

Is there anyone who could help me understanding integrals?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your \beta_{xy} = 0 is a consequence of orthonormality of your orbitals. Notice your integrand has xy in it. When you do your integral over dx the function \Delta U will be even, and the function x is odd, so you are integrating the product of an even function with an odd function over all x. This will give you zero.

Think about what cubic symmetry means for integrals like \beta_xx and \beta_yy. The key point is that it's *cubic* symmetry. What does that mean? How does x relate to y and z?
 
kanato said:
Think about what cubic symmetry means for integrals like \beta_{xx} and \beta_{yy]. The key point is that it's *cubic* symmetry. What does that mean? How does x relate to y and z?

It smells like \pi / 2 rotational symmetry for each axes but.. still not clear.
 
Yeah.. what happens to your coordinate system if you rotate by 90 degrees about some axis. If you rotate around z, it will transform x into y and y into -x. So take your \beta_{xx} and rotate the coordinate system used in the integral. You should see it becomes exactly the integral in \beta_{yy}
 
Yes, now it's more clear.
Thanks for your constructive talk.

Know another question appers..
In simple cubic crystal for the first 6 nearest-neighbor;
\gamma_{ij}(R)=- \int d\vec{r} \psi^{*}_{i}(\vec{r})\psi_{j}(\vec{r}-\vec{R}) \Delta U(\vec{r})
must be diagonal.
I made some calculations for \gamma_{xy} in attached the document.

Is it diagonal for the same reason?
 

Attachments

  • Adsız.jpg
    Adsız.jpg
    28.3 KB · Views: 777

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K