- #1
komodekork
- 17
- 0
When physicist talk about time after the big bang, what do they mean? Time is relative, so which frame of reference are they talking about?
Could anyone please explain?
Could anyone please explain?
komodekork said:When physicist talk about time after the big bang, what do they mean? Time is relative, so which frame of reference are they talking about?
Could anyone please explain?
komodekork said:When physicist talk about time after the big bang, what do they mean? Time is relative, so which frame of reference are they talking about?
Could anyone please explain?
cosmik debris said:... cosmological time in some theoretical spacetimes is like an absolute cosmological time. I know this contradicts relativity ...QUOTE]
Uh ... how is that? Relatively has to do with the relative motion of two bodies. How does time since the big bang have anything to do with that?
Thanks,
Paul
In general, there are no frames of reference in GR that cover all of space-time (like they do in SR). However, one can usually come up with coordinate systems that cover all of space-time. Cosmologists often use a coordinate system wherein the CMB is at rest. So, the amount of time you mentioned is the amount of proper time elapsed since the big bang in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronous_coordinates" in which the CMB, ideally, is a purely spacelike hypersurface.komodekork said:Time is relative, so which frame of reference are they talking about?
No it doesn't. It has to do with reference frames. In general relativity, all reference frames are equally appropriate -- the Lorentz symmetry enjoyed by inertial observers is no longer a preferred symmetry. What cosmik is saying, however, is that some spacetimes possesses sufficient symmetry to define a global time variable (just like one does for inertial frames in special relativity). In these spacetimes, this time variable is a 'natural' choice to run a clock by. In our FRW universe, observers comoving with the expansion (at reast wrt the CMB) are in one such frame. We are (very closely) comoving observers, and so this is the clock used by modern cosmologists. But this time is still no better than any other -- one can choose whichever frame one wishes; some are simply more convenient than others. (To see what I mean by convenience, imagine using galaxy-centric coordinates to plan satellite trajectories around the Earth -- obviously one should use geocentric coordinates for such a feat.)phinds said:Uh ... how is that? Relatively has to do with the relative motion of two bodies. How does time since the big bang have anything to do with that?
bapowell said:No it doesn't. It has to do with reference frames. In general relativity, all reference frames are equally appropriate -- the Lorentz symmetry enjoyed by inertial observers is no longer a preferred symmetry. What cosmik is saying, however, is that some spacetimes possesses sufficient symmetry to define a global time variable (just like one does for inertial frames in special relativity). In these spacetimes, this time variable is a 'natural' choice to run a clock by. In our FRW universe, observers comoving with the expansion (at reast wrt the CMB) are in one such frame. We are (very closely) comoving observers, and so this is the clock used by modern cosmologists. But this time is still no better than any other -- one can choose whichever frame one wishes; some are simply more convenient than others. (To see what I mean by convenience, imagine using galaxy-centric coordinates to plan satellite trajectories around the Earth -- obviously one should use geocentric coordinates for such a feat.)
The big bang theory suggests that time is a fundamental aspect of the universe that began with the expansion of space and matter at the moment of the big bang. Time is considered to be a dimension that is inseparable from space and is affected by the presence of matter and energy.
The big bang theory proposes that the universe began as a singularity, a point of infinite density and temperature. As the singularity expanded, it created space and time, marking the beginning of the universe. This event is often referred to as the "birth" of time.
Yes, according to Einstein's theory of relativity, time is relative and can be affected by factors such as gravity and velocity. In the context of the big bang theory, time is also relative to the expansion of the universe and the presence of matter and energy.
Time plays a pivotal role in the expansion of the universe according to the big bang theory. As the universe continues to expand, so does time. This means that the age of the universe is constantly increasing and the concept of "now" is always changing.
The big bang theory suggests that time is a fundamental aspect of the universe and cannot exist without it. However, other theories, such as the steady-state theory, propose that the universe has always existed and time is infinite. This is still a topic of debate and further research is needed to fully understand the nature of time.