Time Derivative of Expectation Value of Position

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the relationship between the time derivative of the expectation value of position and momentum, specifically that ∂⟨x⟩/∂t = ⟨p_x⟩/m. The attempt involves using the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and applying integration by parts to derive the expression. However, the user encounters issues where their calculations lead to an incorrect conclusion of zero, indicating a potential mistake in the integration process. Clarifications are provided regarding the correct application of the product rule and the need to maintain proper signs in the equations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful mathematical manipulation in quantum mechanics proofs.
Matt Chu
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I want to prove that ##\frac{\partial \langle x \rangle}{\partial t} = \frac{\langle p_x \rangle}{m}##.

Homework Equations



$$i\hbar \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial t} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} + V \Psi$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
So given the expectation value of position,

$$\langle x \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^* x \Psi \ dx$$

I'm trying to show that the time derivative of this is equal to ##\frac{ \langle p_x \rangle}{m}##.

I started by using the product rule, which gave:

$$\frac{\partial \langle x \rangle}{\partial t} = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \left[ \Psi^* x \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial \Psi^*}{\partial t} x \Psi \right] dx$$

Then, using the time-dependent Schrödinger equation:

$$\frac{\partial \langle x \rangle}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{i\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^* x (H \Psi) dx - \frac{1}{i\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^\infty (H \Psi)^* x \Psi dx$$
$$= \frac{1}{i\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^* x \left( - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} + V \Psi \right) dx - \frac{1}{i\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \left( - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi^*}{\partial x^2} + V \Psi^* \right) x \Psi dx$$

(The ##V## components cancel out.)

$$= -\frac{i \hbar}{2m} \int_{\infty}^\infty \left[ -\Psi^* x \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} \right] dx + \frac{i\hbar}{2m} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \left[\frac{\partial^2 \Psi^*}{\partial x^2} x \Psi \right] dx$$

I then tried integrating by parts, which gives:

$$= \frac{i\hbar}{2m} \left( \left. -x\Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right|_{-\infty}^\infty + \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} dx + \int_{\infty}^\infty x \left| \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right|^2 dx \right) + \frac{i\hbar}{2m} \left( \left. x\Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right|_{-\infty}^\infty - \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} dx - \int_{-\infty}^\infty x \left| \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right|^2 dx \right)$$

However, at this point, every part in the above equation is real, so the equation ends up equalling zero. Where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As I recall, this is done by integrating by parts twice working on one of terms only. You will see better what's going on if you write $$
x \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x}\frac{\partial \Psi^*}{\partial x} dx$$ after the fist parts integration. Then after the second parts integration you get a term $$x \Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} dx.$$Also, please preview and fix (if necessary) your LaTeX code before posting.
 
kuruman said:
As I recall, this is done by integrating by parts twice working on one of terms only. You will see better what's going on if you write $$
x \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x}\frac{\partial \Psi^*}{\partial x} dx$$ after the fist parts integration. Then after the second parts integration you get a term $$x \Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} dx.$$Also, please preview and fix (if necessary) your LaTeX code before posting.

I'm not exactly sure why I would integrate by parts again. Integrating by parts once already gives me zero, which is definitely not correct. There must be some mathematical or conceptual mistake that I've made because I don't think it's possible to proceed with what I've done.
 
In this expression that you have posted
$$ -\frac{i \hbar}{2m} \int_{\infty}^\infty \left[ -\Psi^* x \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} \right] dx + \frac{i\hbar}{2m} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \left[\frac{\partial^2 \Psi^*}{\partial x^2} x \Psi \right] dx$$the second integral must have a negative sign in front of it. Look at the line above. The second integral has an overall positive sign in front of the ##\hbar^2## term. When you bring ##i## to the numerator you get an overall negative sign.
Matt Chu said:
I'm not exactly sure why I would integrate by parts again.
You don't. I was thinking of the solution to another problem. Sorry for the confusion.
 
Matt Chu said:
I then tried integrating by parts, which gives:

$$= \frac{i\hbar}{2m} \left( \left. -x\Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right|_{-\infty}^\infty + \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} dx + \int_{\infty}^\infty x \left| \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right|^2 dx \right) + \frac{i\hbar}{2m} \left( \left. x\Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right|_{-\infty}^\infty - \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} dx - \int_{-\infty}^\infty x \left| \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right|^2 dx \right)$$

However, at this point, every part in the above equation is real, so the equation ends up equalling zero. Where did I go wrong?

You have ended up with ##\Psi^*## in both integrals. It should be ##\Psi## in one of them. In any case, your expression should reduce to:

$$= \frac{i\hbar}{2m} \left( \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi \frac{\partial \Psi^*}{\partial x} dx - \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} dx \right)$$

And then you do hit one of the terms with integration by parts again.
 
Matt Chu said:

Homework Statement



I want to prove that ##\frac{\partial \langle x \rangle}{\partial t} = \frac{\langle p_x \rangle}{m}##.
[...]
However, at this point, every part in the above equation is real, so the equation ends up equalling zero. Where did I go wrong?
First, you wrote down what you are supposed to prove, incorrectly. It should be:
##\frac{\partial \langle x \rangle}{\partial t} = \frac{\langle p \rangle}{m}##

And you needn't go through all of the integrations to do it. ##\langle x\rangle = \langle\psi|x|\psi\rangle##. Take the time derivative of both sides. You get three terms, two of which may be written as a commutator.
 
Matt Chu said:
I want to prove that ##\frac{\partial \langle x \rangle}{\partial t} = \frac{\langle p_x \rangle}{m}##.

bobob said:
First, you wrote down what you are supposed to prove, incorrectly. It should be:
##\frac{\partial \langle x \rangle}{\partial t} = \frac{\langle p \rangle}{m}##

And you needn't go through all of the integrations to do it. ##\langle x\rangle = \langle\psi|x|\psi\rangle##. Take the time derivative of both sides. You get three terms, two of which may be written as a commutator.

The OP has merely emphasisd that it's ##p_x## (momentum in the x-direction). There's nothing wrong with that.

The OP is clearly looking for a wave-mechanical proof. Referring him to a linear algebra formalism that he may not yet have encountered is less than helpful.

If, however, you do want to be pedantic, then it should be an ordinary derivative ##\frac{d\langle x \rangle}{dt}##, as the expectation value is only a function of the one variable; namely, ##t##.
 
PeroK said:
The OP has merely emphasisd that it's ##p_x## (momentum in the x-direction). There's nothing wrong with that.

The OP is clearly looking for a wave-mechanical proof. Referring him to a linear algebra formalism that he may not yet have encountered is less than helpful.

If, however, you do want to be pedantic, then it should be an ordinary derivative ##\frac{d\langle x \rangle}{dt}##, as the expectation value is only a function of the one variable; namely, ##t##.

Didn't look like a subscript when I saw it.
 
Matt Chu said:

Homework Statement



I want to prove that ##\frac{\partial \langle x \rangle}{\partial t} = \frac{\langle p_x \rangle}{m}##.

Homework Equations



$$i\hbar \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial t} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} + V \Psi$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
So given the expectation value of position,

$$\langle x \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^* x \Psi \ dx$$

I'm trying to show that the time derivative of this is equal to ##\frac{ \langle p_x \rangle}{m}##.

I started by using the product rule, which gave:

$$\frac{\partial \langle x \rangle}{\partial t} = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \left[ \Psi^* x \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial \Psi^*}{\partial t} x \Psi \right] dx$$

Then, using the time-dependent Schrödinger equation:

$$\frac{\partial \langle x \rangle}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{i\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^* x (H \Psi) dx - \frac{1}{i\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^\infty (H \Psi)^* x \Psi dx$$
$$= \frac{1}{i\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^* x \left( - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} + V \Psi \right) dx - \frac{1}{i\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \left( - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi^*}{\partial x^2} + V \Psi^* \right) x \Psi dx$$

(The ##V## components cancel out.)

$$= -\frac{i \hbar}{2m} \int_{\infty}^\infty \left[ -\Psi^* x \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} \right] dx + \frac{i\hbar}{2m} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \left[\frac{\partial^2 \Psi^*}{\partial x^2} x \Psi \right] dx$$

I then tried integrating by parts, which gives:

$$= \frac{i\hbar}{2m} \left( \left. -x\Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right|_{-\infty}^\infty + \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} dx + \int_{\infty}^\infty x \left| \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right|^2 dx \right) + \frac{i\hbar}{2m} \left( \left. x\Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right|_{-\infty}^\infty - \int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} dx - \int_{-\infty}^\infty x \left| \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right|^2 dx \right)$$

However, at this point, every part in the above equation is real, so the equation ends up equalling zero. Where did I go wrong?
In your last expression, you have dropped the minus sign in front of the ##i \hbar/2m## in front of the first parenthesis. That's the source of the problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
672
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K