Time derivative of Hubble parameter

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The time derivative of the Hubble parameter, H(t), is derived using calculus techniques such as the product rule and the quotient rule. Specifically, H(t) is defined as H(t) = a'/a, where a' is the derivative of the scale factor a with respect to time. In the standard cosmological model, the derivative of H is consistently negative, as it is proportional to -(ρ + p), where ρ is energy density and p is pressure. As the universe expands and matter density decreases, the derivative approaches zero, indicating a transition to exponential growth characterized by a constant positive percentage growth rate, H∞.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically the product rule and quotient rule for derivatives.
  • Familiarity with the Hubble parameter and its definition in cosmology.
  • Knowledge of the Friedmann equations and their implications in the standard cosmological model.
  • Basic concepts of energy density (ρ) and pressure (p) in cosmological contexts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Friedmann equations in cosmology.
  • Learn about the implications of the cosmological constant (Λ) on the expansion of the universe.
  • Explore the relationship between energy density, pressure, and the dynamics of cosmic expansion.
  • Investigate the concept of accelerated expansion and its mathematical representation in cosmological models.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, physics students, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of cosmic expansion and the behavior of the Hubble parameter over time.

Lapidus
Messages
344
Reaction score
12
Is rather a question of calculus skills, but how do I get the time derivative of the Hubble parameter here in [1]? Is it the Leibnitz rule, the chain rule, some clever re-arrangement?


thank you
 
Space news on Phys.org
Lapidus said:
Is rather a question of calculus skills, but how do I get the time derivative of the Hubble parameter here in [1]? Is it the Leibnitz rule, the chain rule, some clever re-arrangement?thank you

equation [1] is a straightforward application of the definition of H(t) = a'/a
and the Leibnitz rule
or I would call it the "quotient rule" for taking derivative of f(t)/g(t)

You can also think of it as the "product rule" applied to the two functions f(t) and (1/g(t))

Notice that (1/a)' = (-a'/a2) (I guess you could call that an application of "chain rule")

so you just make a simple application of product rule to H(t) = a' * (1/a)

and you get a'' * (1/a) + a' * (-a'/a2) = a''/a - (a'/a)2

======================

Be careful there is something misleading in the last 4 or 5 equations on that page you linked to!

In the standard cosmological model the derivative of H is always negative.

That page is a bit inconsistent because it introduces the Friedman equations WITH LAMBDA THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT, so there should be no "dark energy component" in the energy density rho, and the pressure p.

rho and p are just positive terms like you would expect, nothing tricky.

So he actually shows that the derivative of H is NEGATIVE because it is proportional to
-(rho + p), which is negative.

And this is correct, according to standard model (where you have a cosmological constant).

As matter thins out, rho + p goes to zero,

so the derivative of H, which is negative, goes to zero. So H declines slower and slower and levels out to a constant positive percentage growth rate H in the limit.

This is what is meant by "accelerated expansion" (H declining to a positive limiting value) because growth at a constant percentage rate is, of course, EXPONENTIAL growth. So if you watch a particular distance grow, it goes like money in the bank at a constant percentage rate of interest.

"Acceleration" does not mean that H(t) should increase. In the standard model with cosmo constant Lambda, it just means that the DECLINE of H(t) is leveling out to a small positive value so we get exponential growth.

Currently H is about 1/144 of a percent per million years, and the expected H limit is 1/173 of a percent per million years.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K