Time derivative of relativistic momentum help

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around taking the time derivative of the relativistic momentum expression ϒmv, exploring the implications of the product rule and the behavior of the gamma factor in the context of relativistic mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the product rule for derivatives and question the treatment of the gamma factor and mass as separate functions. There is also inquiry into the handling of negative signs in the derivative calculations.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify the derivative process and correct earlier mistakes regarding signs. Some participants express confusion about specific terms and seek further elaboration on the rules applied in the derivation.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of assumptions regarding mass conservation and the treatment of constants in the derivative process, specifically regarding the speed of light.

diewlasing
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
How does one take the time derivative of ϒmv ?

I tried treating gamma and mv as separate functions but it just gets messy and ultimately wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
diewlasing said:
How does one take the time derivative of ϒmv ?

I tried treating gamma and mv as separate functions but it just gets messy and ultimately wrong.

Well, the product rule simply gives:
\dot {\vec{p}} = \dot {\gamma} m \vec{v} + \gamma \dot {m} \vec{v} + \gamma m \dot {\vec{v}}

For systems that conserve mass, \dot m =0. While,
\dot {\gamma} = \frac{d}{dt} \left( 1- \frac{v^2}{c^2} \right) ^{-1/2} = \left( \frac{-1}{2} \right) \left( \frac{2v \dot {v} }{c^2} \right) \left( 1- \frac{v^2}{c^2} \right) ^{-3/2} = - \gamma ^3 \left( \frac{v \dot {v}}{c^2} \right)

And so,

\dot {\vec{p}} = \gamma m \dot {\vec{v}} -\gamma ^3 m \left( \frac{v \dot {v}}{c^2} \right) \vec{v} =\gamma m {\vec{a}} -\gamma ^3 m \left( \frac{v a}{c^2} \right) \vec{v}
 
Why is \left( \frac{2v \dot {v} }{c^2} \right) not \left( \frac{-2v \dot {v} }{c^2} \right)? What happened to the minus sign?
 
snoopies622 said:
Why is \left( \frac{2v \dot {v} }{c^2} \right) not \left( \frac{-2v \dot {v} }{c^2} \right)? What happened to the minus sign?

OOps,. my bad:redface:. Yes I accidentally dropped a negative sign. The correct answer should be
\dot {\vec{p}} = \gamma m \dot {\vec{v}} +\gamma ^3 m \left( \frac{v \dot {v}}{c^2} \right) \vec{v} =\gamma m {\vec{a}} +\gamma ^3 m \left( \frac{v a}{c^2} \right) \vec{v}
 
Ah yes, thank you
 
i can't get (−2*v*v/c^2). what rule do we use on this? can anybody show a more detail step on this part?
 
Last edited:
sgwayne said:
i can't get (−2*v*v/c^2). what rule do we use on this? can anybody show a more detail step on this part?

Chain rule. Since v is a function of t, the time derivative of 1-v^2/c^2 is -2v(dv/dt)/c^2.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=343032
I posted a similar question a year after this one if you want a second angle.
 
Last edited:
thanks master newbie, i was confused on the c^2 actually. so we just leave it as it is bcoz we want the derivative of v not c. correct me if I'm wrong.
 
It is left there because c (and c^2) is a constant.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K