I Time derivative of the angular momentum as a cross product

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equations of motion for angular momentum in a system with a particle and a magnetic moment in a magnetic field. The Hamiltonian is defined, leading to the time evolution equation for angular momentum as a cross product involving the magnetic field. The identification of the term related to angular velocity with the expression for angular momentum evolution raises questions about its justification. The user seeks clarification on the significance of this identification and its relation to known concepts like Larmor precession. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping the dynamics of the system.
AndersF
Messages
27
Reaction score
4
I am trying to find the equations of motion of the angular momentum ##\boldsymbol L## for a system consisting of a particle of mass ##m## and magnetic moment ##\boldsymbol{\mu} \equiv \gamma \boldsymbol{L}## in a magnetic field ##\boldsymbol B##. The Hamiltonian of the system is therefore

##H=\frac{p^{2}}{2 m}-\gamma \boldsymbol{L} \cdot \boldsymbol{B}##

I have found that the time evolution equation for the angular momentum is

##\frac{d \boldsymbol{L}}{d t}=-\gamma \boldsymbol{B} \times \boldsymbol{L}##

However, the solution identifies the term ##-\gamma \boldsymbol{B}## with the angular velocity ##\boldsymbol{\Omega}##:

##\frac{d \boldsymbol{L}}{d t}=\boldsymbol{\Omega} \times \boldsymbol{L}##

I do not understand what the justification is for making this identification. This last equation looks familiar to me, but I'm not sure where I've seen it... Could someone give me some guidance on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think he introduced a new parameter defined as
\Omega:=-\gamma B.
 
Okay, but does the formula ##\frac{d \boldsymbol{L}}{d t}=\boldsymbol{\Omega} \times \boldsymbol{L}## have any special meaning, being ##\boldsymbol{\Omega}## the angular velocity?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top