The Lagrange–d'Alembert principle for rigid bodies

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Lagrange–d'Alembert principle is a powerful tool in nonholonomic mechanics, often underutilized beyond deriving Lagrange equations. This discussion presents a specific problem involving a ball in a chute formed by two planes, where one plane moves horizontally while the other remains fixed. The solution for the acceleration of the ball's center is derived using the principle, resulting in the formula $$\frac{\dot u}{\frac{mr^2}{J}\Big(1-\cos\alpha\Big)+2},\quad J=2mr^2/5$$. The principle's advantage lies in its ability to formulate equations of motion without the need for reaction forces at contact points.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Lagrange–d'Alembert principle
  • Familiarity with nonholonomic mechanics
  • Basic knowledge of rigid body dynamics
  • Proficiency in solving differential equations related to motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced applications of the Lagrange–d'Alembert principle in nonholonomic systems
  • Study the derivation of Lagrange equations from the principle
  • Investigate the implications of reaction forces in rigid body dynamics
  • Learn about holonomic versus nonholonomic constraints in mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers specializing in mechanics, particularly those focusing on rigid body dynamics and nonholonomic systems.

wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,278
Reaction score
1,079
This post is also an invitation to compose problems of the presented below type.
The Lagrange–d'Alembert principle by itself is used very seldom. It is usually used to derive the Lagrange equations and that is all. But actually it is a powerful tool in nonholonomic mechanics.
As an example consider a problem which is interesting by itself.
A chute is formed by two planes. The angle between the planes equals ##\alpha\in(0,\pi)## and it does not depend on time. The planes intersect by a horizontal line ##\ell##. The line ##\ell## does not change its position in the space during the time.
One of the planes is fixed while other plane moves in horizontal direction along the line ##\ell##. The velocity of this plane is a given function ##\boldsymbol u=\boldsymbol u(t)##.
Then one puts a homogeneous ball inside the chute. The ball does not slip by the both planes. Find the acceleration of the center of the ball.
pic.jpg

The answer is
$$\frac{\dot u}{\frac{mr^2}{J}\Big(1-\cos\alpha\Big)+2},\quad J=2mr^2/5.$$
Here ##r## is a radius of the ball; ##m## is its mass.
Let us now sketch the solution by means of the Lagrange–d'Alembert principle.
Let ##S## stand for the center of the ball; ##A## stand for the contact point of the ball and the moving plane and let ##B## be the contact point of the ball and the fixed plane.
The conditions of non-slipness are
$$\boldsymbol v_S+\boldsymbol \omega\times \boldsymbol {SA}=\boldsymbol u;\quad\boldsymbol v_S+\boldsymbol \omega\times \boldsymbol {SB}=0.$$
Here ##\boldsymbol \omega## is the angular velocity of the ball.
The Lagrange–d'Alembert principle is
$$(J\boldsymbol{\dot\omega},\boldsymbol\xi)+(m\boldsymbol{\dot v}_S,\boldsymbol\gamma)=0.$$
This equation must be satisfied for all virtual displacements ##\boldsymbol\xi,\boldsymbol\gamma## such that
$$\boldsymbol \gamma+\boldsymbol \xi\times \boldsymbol {SA}=0;\quad\boldsymbol \gamma+\boldsymbol \xi\times \boldsymbol {SB}=0.$$These are the equations of motion. They allow to accomplish the solution of the problem.

The gain of using the Lagrange–d'Alembert principle is as follows. The equations of motion do not contain reaction forces at points ##A,B##. Moreover these reactions can not be defined uniquely.

Note also that if ##\boldsymbol u=0## then the problem is holonomic.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, weirdoguy, jedishrfu and 3 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Nice! Why not make this a PF insight article?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
521
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
656
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K