Time Dilation at Center of a Neutron Star

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on gravitational time dilation at the center of neutron star PSR J1614-2230, where time runs approximately three times slower than in weaker gravitational fields. The relevant formula for time dilation inside a massive body is derived from the gravitational potential, incorporating the mass of the neutron star (4 × 10^30 kg) and its estimated radius (10,000 m). The equation of state for neutron stars remains uncertain, complicating the determination of their interior metrics and time dilation effects. Current research continues to explore various proposed equations of state (FPS, UU, APR, L, SLy) to better understand neutron star matter.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational time dilation principles
  • Familiarity with Einstein's equations and general relativity
  • Knowledge of neutron star characteristics and equations of state
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical physics, particularly in solving differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the equations of state for neutron stars, focusing on FPS, UU, APR, L, and SLy models
  • Study the interior Schwarzschild solution and its implications for neutron star metrics
  • Explore the effects of pressure on neutron star gravity and time dilation
  • Investigate current methodologies for modeling neutron star structures beyond static approximations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and researchers in gravitational physics who are studying neutron stars, gravitational time dilation, and the implications of general relativity in extreme environments.

PatrickPowers
Messages
237
Reaction score
1
From https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=40391 in gravitational time dilation.

DW said:
That formula is only valid for the region exterior to the earth. Inside the Earth the corresponding formula would be
t = \frac{\tau}{\sqrt{1 + \frac{2\Phi}{c^2}}}
\Phi = \frac{1}{2}\frac{GM_{tot}r^{2}}{R^{3}} - \frac{3}{2}\frac{GM_{tot}}{R}
where M_{tot} is the mass of the planet, R is its radius, r is the distance of the clock inside the Earth from the center with \tau as its time and t is the time for a far remote clock. According to this gravitational time dilation is greatest at the center.

At the center of neutron star PSR J1614-2230 at 1.97 SM

mass of Sun 1.9891×10^30 kg

mass of PSR J1614-2230. 4 ×10^30

gravitational constant = 6.67300 × 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2

radius(rough estimate) = 10000m

phi = - 3/2 * 6.67300 × 10-11 * 4 ×10^30 / 10000

phi = - 4 × 10^20 / 10000

phi = - 4 × 10^16

sqrt( 1 + 2phi/c^2 )

sqrt( 1 - 2 * 4 × 10^16 / (3^10^8)^2

sqrt( 1 - 8 / 9 )

sqrt( 1/9) = .33

so time runs perhaps three times as slowly at the center than in an area of weak gravity.I have read that the gravity of a neutron star owes more to its pressure than its mass. I don't know whether these figures take that into account.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Presumably the M_tot includes all the contributions from pressure/energy. I'm not sure about interior solutions, but this is at least the case for the exterior Schwarzschild solution.
 
The general form of the interior metric of a neutron star is not currently known, as far as I know, because the equation of state of the neutron degenerate matter, rho(P), is not known.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neutron_star&oldid=464462435

wiki said:
The equation of state for a neutron star is still not known. It is assumed that it differs significantly from that of a white dwarf, whose EOS is that of a degenerate gas which can be described in close agreement with special relativity. However, with a neutron star the increased effects of general relativity can no longer be ignored. Several EOS have been proposed (FPS, UU, APR, L, SLy, and others) and current research is still attempting to constrain the theories to make predictions of neutron star matter
If you did know (or assume you knew) the equation of state, for a static star solving Einstein's equations (the interior Schwarzschild solution) arising from that equation of state would give you the interior metric, and hence the time dilation. If you wanted to go beyond the static approximation (i.e. to include the effects of radiation on the stellar structure), you'd need an even more sophisticated model.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
82
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
7K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K