Time Dilation Effect: Corrections to Clocks on ISS

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the time dilation effects experienced by clocks aboard the International Space Station (ISS) due to their speed in orbit. The net time difference on the ISS is approximately 1 second per lifetime, which does not necessitate frequent corrections for synchronization with Earth clocks. While GPS satellite clocks are adjusted for both gravitational and velocity time dilation, the ISS clocks operate normally without the need for corrections unless conducting high-precision experiments that require synchronization with Earth-based clocks. Such experiments are rare due to the minimal impact of time dilation at the ISS's orbital altitude.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Hafele-Keating experiment and its implications on time dilation
  • Familiarity with the principles of gravitational and velocity time dilation
  • Knowledge of GPS technology and its clock synchronization methods
  • Basic concepts of high-precision measurements in scientific experiments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Hafele-Keating experiment and its findings on atomic clocks
  • Learn about gravitational and velocity time dilation effects in detail
  • Explore the mechanisms of GPS clock adjustments and synchronization
  • Investigate high-precision experiments conducted on the ISS that may be affected by time dilation
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in physics, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in the effects of relativity on timekeeping in space environments.

saddlestone-man
Messages
80
Reaction score
20
TL;DR
How often are corrections applied to clocks aboard the ISS to synchronise them to clocks on Earth?
Hello All

The Hafele-Keating experiment in 1971 confirmed measurable time dilation effects on atomic clocks flown around the Earth on aircraft.

Presumably clocks aboard the International Space Station suffer worse time dilation because of their greater speed in orbit. How often are corrections applied to clocks aboard the ISS to keep them synchronised to clocks on Earth?

best regards ... Stef
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The nett time difference on ISS is on the order of 1 second per lifetime. Hardly a need to worry about outside high precision measurements.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
Note however that GPS satellite clocks run faster than a clock on the Earth since the gravitational time dilation effect is larger than the one due to the velocity. For the ISS orbit we are still in a low enough orbit for the velocity effect to dominate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Ibix
Bandersnatch said:
The nett time difference on ISS is on the order of 1 second per lifetime. Hardly a need to worry about outside high precision measurements.
The question is therefore are there any high precision measurements going on on board ISS and how often are corrections made so that these measurements are valid?
 
saddlestone-man said:
The question is therefore are there any high precision measurements going on on board ISS
Not quite. The clocks in the ISS work perfectly normally and no correction is needed. You only have problems if you are doing experiments with one component in the ISS and another on Earth or in a different vehicle, in which case the clocks at the two locations might tick at different rates. That's why the GPS clocks are slightly adjusted, because part of the service includes receivers on Earth and we need precise time in the Earth time system not the satellite one.

The only types of experiment I can think of that would require enough precision to be affected by gravitational time dilation are ones to test time dilation, where of course you don't adjust the clocks because their mismatch is the point. I could be wrong - I don't know what experiments they're running. But the degree of time dilation is so slight that it would be something very rare indeed that would care.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444 and russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K