Is Time Reversed in Special Relativity When Moving Opposite to Light?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of special relativity on time perception and light propagation when observers are in relative motion. It explores concepts such as time dilation, length contraction, and the behavior of light in different reference frames, particularly when moving opposite to the direction of light.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario involving two observers in different frames of reference, questioning whether the perception of time could be reversed based on the direction of light travel.
  • Another participant clarifies that while the path length of light may appear shorter in certain conditions, this does not imply a reversal of time dilation effects, emphasizing that length contraction only occurs in the direction of motion.
  • A third participant acknowledges the clarification and expresses understanding of the concepts discussed.
  • Another participant introduces a perspective suggesting that if one moves opposite to the light, the light must travel longer distances in some directions, implying a complex relationship between distance and time perception.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of light travel and time perception, with no consensus reached on whether time can be perceived as reversed in the discussed scenarios.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of light and the effects of relative motion that may not be fully resolved, particularly regarding the interaction of time dilation and length contraction.

ghost34
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I've just been introduced to special relativity and time dilation. I understand that if someone in a frame of reference X bounces a beam of light vertically within two parallel mirrors, I, in a frame of reference Y moving at a uniform velocity 'U' from X, will see the light beam moving across a hypotenuse (diagonally), and given the postulate that the speed of light is equal for all observers, it will take me more time to view this same beam of light, and the person in frame of reference X can say that my clocks are slowing down. But let's say that the person in frame of reference X intentionally shoots a beam of light diagonally across the same mirrors, so that the light is traveling diagonally within his own frame of reference. If I am moving at velocity U in the opposite direction of the light, is it not possible (if U isn't very large) that I'll see the beam of light traveling across a shorter distance? If this is true, is it not possible that the person in frame of reference X can rightly say that my time will be faster due to how the light appears in my reference frame?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Excellent question ghost34, and welcome to PF.

You're right, the path length would be smaller in the second case, but that would not mean that the effect of time dilation would be reversed.

In special relativity, length contraction only occurs in the direction of motion. Thus, having a light beam traveling perpendicular to the direction of motion (i.e. up and down) makes sure that there is no length contraction effecting the experiment (i.e. the clock). Therefore the only observed effect is due to time dilation.

If you point the laser partially in the direction of motion then two effects are taking place; time dilation and length contraction---making the overall interpretation different.
 
Ah, I see. Thank you very much, zhermes!
 
No, if you move in the opposite direction of the light, then light moves faster in the opposite direction of you, therefore light must move slower in some other direction, which means light must travel a long distance in the direction of the fast motion, in order to travel a short distance in the direction of the slow motion.

It takes a long time to travel a long distance + a short distance

There may be a simple way to say this too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K